Impact of prebiopsy MRI on prostate cancer staging: Results from the Norwegian Prostate Cancer Registry

Erik Skaaheim Haug1,2,3, Tor Åge Myklebust3, Patrick Juliebø-Jones4,5

  • 1Department of Urology Vestfold Hospital Trust Tønsberg Norway.

BJUI Compass
|April 7, 2023
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

The introduction of prebiopsy prostate MRI improved prostate cancer staging accuracy. This change in diagnostic approach has influenced treatment decisions, particularly for locally advanced high-risk disease.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • The standard of care for prostate cancer diagnosis has evolved.
  • Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate (MRI-P) was introduced in Norway in 2015.
  • Evaluating the impact of MRI-P on prostate cancer staging and treatment is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of prebiopsy prostate MRI (MRI-P) on prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis in Norway.
  • To assess the accuracy of MRI-P based clinical T-staging (cT-staging) compared to digital rectal examination (DRE)-based staging against pathological T-stage (pT-stage).
  • To determine if treatment allocations have changed following the introduction of MRI-P.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from the Norwegian Prostate Cancer Registry (2004-2021) including 5538 patients.
  • Assessment of concordance between clinical T-stage (cT-stage) and pathological T-stage (pT-stage) using percentage agreement, Cohen's kappa, and Gwet's agreement.
  • Comparison of staging accuracy and treatment allocation before and after the 2015 introduction of MRI-P.

Main Results:

  • MRI-P influenced tumor extension reporting, potentially improving clinical T-stage accuracy.
  • Agreement between cT-stage and pT-stage initially declined but improved after 2010, coinciding with MRI-P introduction.
  • Treatment allocation appears to have shifted towards radiotherapy for locally advanced high-risk disease post-MRI-P implementation.

Conclusions:

  • The introduction of MRI-P has impacted clinical T-stage reporting and appears to have improved agreement between clinical and pathological staging.
  • MRI-P use influences treatment decisions in specific patient subgroups, particularly those with locally advanced disease.