Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
Published on: October 10, 2019
Impact of prebiopsy MRI on prostate cancer staging: Results from the Norwegian Prostate Cancer Registry
Erik Skaaheim Haug1,2,3, Tor Åge Myklebust3, Patrick Juliebø-Jones4,5
1Department of Urology Vestfold Hospital Trust Tønsberg Norway.
Objectives:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the 2015 introduction of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate (MRI-P) as the standard of care for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) by the Norwegian public health care authorities. There were three specific objectives of this study: first, to evaluate the consequences of using different TNM manuals for clinical T-staging (cT-staging) in a national setting; second, to determine if the data reveals that MRI-P based cT-staging is superior to digital rectal examination (DRE)-based cT-staging compared with pathological T-stage (pT-stage) post radical prostatectomy; and third, to assess whether treatment allocations have changed over time.
Materials And Methods:
All patients registered in the Norwegian Prostate Cancer Registry between 2004 and 2021 were retrieved and 5538 were eligible for inclusion. Concordance between clinical T-stage (cT-stage) and pT-stage was assessed by percentage agreement, Cohen's kappa and Gwet's agreement.
Results:
MR visualisation of lesions influences reporting of tumour extension beyond DRE findings. Agreement between cT-stage and pT-stage declined from 2004 to 2009, which coincided with an increase in the percentage being pT3. From 2010, agreement increased, which aligned with changes in cT-staging and the introduction of MRI-P. From 2017, regarding the reporting of cT-DRE and cT-Total (overall cT-stage), agreement diminished for cT-DRE but remained relatively stable (>60%) for cT-Total. Regarding treatment allocation, the study suggests that staging with MRI-P has shifted treatment towards radiotherapy in locally advanced high-risk disease.
Conclusion:
Introduction of MRI-P has affected cT-stage reporting. Agreement between cT-stage and pT-stage appears to have improved. This study suggests that use of MRI-P influences treatment decisions in certain patient subgroups.
Insights
The introduction of prebiopsy prostate MRI improved prostate cancer staging accuracy. This change in diagnostic approach has influenced treatment decisions, particularly for locally advanced high-risk disease.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Oncology
- Radiology
Background:
- The standard of care for prostate cancer diagnosis has evolved.
- Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate (MRI-P) was introduced in Norway in 2015.
- Evaluating the impact of MRI-P on prostate cancer staging and treatment is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of prebiopsy prostate MRI (MRI-P) on prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis in Norway.
- To assess the accuracy of MRI-P based clinical T-staging (cT-staging) compared to digital rectal examination (DRE)-based staging against pathological T-stage (pT-stage).
- To determine if treatment allocations have changed following the introduction of MRI-P.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the Norwegian Prostate Cancer Registry (2004-2021) including 5538 patients.
- Assessment of concordance between clinical T-stage (cT-stage) and pathological T-stage (pT-stage) using percentage agreement, Cohen's kappa, and Gwet's agreement.
- Comparison of staging accuracy and treatment allocation before and after the 2015 introduction of MRI-P.
Main Results:
- MRI-P influenced tumor extension reporting, potentially improving clinical T-stage accuracy.
- Agreement between cT-stage and pT-stage initially declined but improved after 2010, coinciding with MRI-P introduction.
- Treatment allocation appears to have shifted towards radiotherapy for locally advanced high-risk disease post-MRI-P implementation.
Conclusions:
- The introduction of MRI-P has impacted clinical T-stage reporting and appears to have improved agreement between clinical and pathological staging.
- MRI-P use influences treatment decisions in specific patient subgroups, particularly those with locally advanced disease.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

