Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Guided vs. conventional anti-platelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of
Peng-Yu Zhong1, Jian-Ping Deng1, Jing-Hong Zhao1
1Department of Cardiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Insights
Guided antiplatelet therapy significantly reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI. This strategy offers comparable bleeding risk to conventional therapy, improving net clinical benefits.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The clinical benefit of guided antiplatelet therapy versus conventional therapy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains debated.
- This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of guided antiplatelet therapy in this patient population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the net clinical benefit of guided antiplatelet therapy against conventional antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI.
- To assess the impact of guided therapy on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding risk.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.
- Seven RCTs involving 8,451 patients were included, comparing guided versus conventional antiplatelet therapy.
- Primary outcomes included MACE and major bleeding; secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and mortality. Trial sequential analysis was performed.
Main Results:
- Guided antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced MACE (RR 0.64, P<0.00001), myocardial infarction (RR 0.62, P=0.0001), all-cause death (RR 0.61, P=0.003), and cardiovascular death (RR 0.66, P=0.009).
- No significant differences were observed in stent thrombosis (RR 0.67, P=0.07) or major bleeding (RR 0.86, P=0.27) between groups.
- Subgroup analysis indicated that genotype-guided therapy improved MACE and myocardial infarction outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Guided antiplatelet therapy demonstrates a lower risk of MACE, myocardial infarction, and mortality compared to conventional therapy in ACS patients.
- The guided approach offers comparable safety regarding bleeding risk, suggesting improved net clinical benefit.
- Genotype-guided therapy shows particular promise for reducing adverse cardiovascular events.
Background:
Whether guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is effective in improving net clinical benefits compared with conventional antiplatelet therapy remains controversial. Therefore, we assessed the safety and efficacy of guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Method:
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to select the relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the guided and conventional antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS. The primary and safety outcomes are major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding, respectively. The efficacy outcomes included myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death. We selected the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effect size and calculated it using the Review Manager software. In addition, we evaluated the final results by trial sequential analysis (registered by PROSPERO, CRD 42020210912).
Results:
We selected seven randomized controlled trials and included 8,451 patients in this meta-analysis. Guided antiplatelet therapy can significantly reduce the risk of MACE (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.76, P < 0.00001), myocardial infarction (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.79, P = 0.0001), all-cause death (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.85, P = 0.003), and cardiovascular death (RR 0.66, 0.49-0.90, P = 0.009). In addition, there is no significant difference between the two groups in stent thrombosis (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.03, P = 0.07) and major bleeding (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65-1.13, P = 0.27). The subgroup analysis showed that the guided group based on genotype tests could bring benefits in MACE and myocardial infarction.
Conclusions:
The guided antiplatelet therapy is not only associated with a comparable risk of bleeding but also with a lower risk of MACE, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and stent thrombosis than the conventional strategy in patients with ACS.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

