Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
Neuromuscular organization during balance-correcting responses induced with platform-translation and upper body
Dmitry Verniba1, Vincenzo E Di Bacco1, William H Gage1
1School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract:
Balance-correcting responses are fast, accurate, and functionally- and directionally-specific. However, there remains a lack of clarity in the literature as to how balance-correcting responses are organized, perhaps due to use of various perturbation methods. This study investigated the differences in neuromuscular organization of balance-correcting responses induced with platform-translation (PLAT) and upper body cable-pull (PULL) methods. Healthy males (n = 15; age: 24.3 ± 3.0 years) underwent unexpected forward and backward PLAT and PULL perturbations of equivalent intensity. EMG of leg, thigh, and trunk anterior and posterior muscles was recorded bilaterally during forward-stepping trials. Muscle activation latencies were calculated with respect to perturbation initiation. Repeated measures ANOVAs tested for differences in muscle activation latencies between perturbation methods and body sides (anterior/posterior muscles, swing/stance limb sides); Holm-Bonferroni sequentially rejective procedure adjusted alpha during multiple comparisons. Anterior muscle activation latencies were similar between methods (∼210 ms). During PLAT trials, posterior muscles demonstrated symmetrical distal-proximal activation between 70 ms and 260 ms, bilaterally. During PULL trials, stance-limb side posterior muscles demonstrated proximal-distal activation 70-130 ms; the activation latencies (∼80 ms) were not different between the stance-limb side posterior muscles. Previous examinations of method comparisons have examined results across publications, and generally have not accounted for different stimulus characteristics. This study revealed markedly different neuromuscular organization of balance-correcting responses to two different perturbation methods that utilized, importantly, equivalent perturbation intensity. Interpretation of functional balance recovery responses requires clear understanding of the intensity and nature of the perturbation.
More Related Videos
11:06A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
Published on: April 12, 2016
06:21Postural Organization of Gait Initiation for Biomechanical Analysis Using Force Platform Recordings
Published on: July 26, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Indirect Motor Pathways
The vestibulospinal tract originates in the vestibular nuclei of the brainstem. The vestibular system detects changes in...
Equilibrium and Balance
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?