Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

05:30
Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 5, 2014
28.7K
Impact of a High Observation Trauma Protocol on Patients with Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury
Sean Hamlin1, Rosalyn Alexander, Kathryn Hayes
1From St Lukes University Health Network, Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Bethlehem, PA.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
|April 7, 2023
Summary
The High Observation Trauma (HOT) protocol safely reduced intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for geriatric fall patients with intracranial hemorrhage. This approach decreased ICU use without increasing neurosurgical intervention or mortality rates.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- Geriatric falls resulting in intracranial hemorrhage are increasing nationally.
- A High Observation Trauma (HOT) protocol was implemented for patients with mild intracranial hemorrhage (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 14) without midline shift or intraventricular hemorrhage.
- The protocol evolved to include patients on various anticoagulants (HOT I: none, HOT II: antiplatelets/warfarin, HOT III: direct oral anticoagulants).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the HOT protocol in managing geriatric patients with intracranial hemorrhage.
- To determine if the HOT protocol can reduce intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and associated costs.
- To assess the impact of expanding the HOT protocol to include patients on different types of anticoagulants.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of the institutional trauma registry was conducted for patients admitted under the HOT protocol.
- Patients were stratified into three groups based on admission date, corresponding to the protocol's evolution (HOT I, II, and III).
- Demographics, anticoagulant use, injury characteristics, length of stay, neurointervention rates, and mortality were compared across the groups.
Main Results:
- The percentage of patients admitted to the floor under the HOT protocol increased significantly over time (35% in HOT I to 81% in HOT III).
- Rates of neurointervention remained consistently low across all HOT protocol groups (3.0% in HOT I, 0.5% in HOT II, 0.4% in HOT III).
- Mortality rates were comparable across the groups (0.6% in HOT I, 0.9% in HOT II, 0.2% in HOT III), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.33).
Conclusions:
- The HOT protocol effectively identifies appropriate candidates for stepdown unit admission, reducing ICU utilization.
- Expanding the HOT protocol to include patients on anticoagulants was safe and did not lead to an increase in adverse neurosurgical outcomes.
- The HOT protocol demonstrates efficacy in managing select geriatric intracranial hemorrhage patients, potentially leading to cost savings.

