Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

Forgetting

Forgetting

Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Effectiveness of Forensic Interview Procedures in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: A Systematic Review.

Journal of child sexual abuse·2026

Same author

Characterizing child sexual abuse and child victims' participation in the Portuguese criminal justice system.

Child abuse & neglect·2026

Same author

How Do We Remember the Future? A Systematic Review of ERP Components in Focal and Nonfocal Prospective Memory Tasks.

Biological psychology·2026

Same author

Between Alarms and Scheduling: The Effect of Cognitive Offloading on Prospective and Retrospective Memory.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Bridging Guidelines and Practice: Questioning Styles in Judicial Interviews with Child Sexual Abuse Victims in Portugal.

Child abuse & neglect·2026

Same author

Chronotype and Subjective Memory Complaints: The Sequential Mediating Roles of Sleep Quality and Psychological Distress.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

Collaborative inhibition effect: the role of memory task and retrieval method.

Magda Saraiva¹, Pedro B Albuquerque², Margarida V Garrido³

¹William James Center for Research, Ispa - Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim Do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041, Lisbon, Portugal. msaraiva@ispa.pt.

Psychological Research

|April 7, 2023

Summary

Collaborative inhibition, where group recall is worse than individual recall, is reduced in serial recall tasks. This finding supports the retrieval strategies disruption hypothesis for memory recall in groups.

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

Eye Tracking, Cortisol, and a Sleep vs. Wake Consolidation Delay: Combining Methods to Uncover an Interactive Effect of Sleep and Cortisol on Memory

Eye Tracking, Cortisol, and a Sleep vs. Wake Consolidation Delay: Combining Methods to Uncover an Interactive Effect of Sleep and Cortisol on Memory

Published on: June 18, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

Eye Tracking, Cortisol, and a Sleep vs. Wake Consolidation Delay: Combining Methods to Uncover an Interactive Effect of Sleep and Cortisol on Memory

Eye Tracking, Cortisol, and a Sleep vs. Wake Consolidation Delay: Combining Methods to Uncover an Interactive Effect of Sleep and Cortisol on Memory

Published on: June 18, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Social Psychology
Human Memory

Background:

Collaborative inhibition is a well-established phenomenon where group recall is inferior to the aggregated recall of individuals working alone.
The retrieval strategies disruption hypothesis posits that conflicting retrieval strategies among group members impair collective memory recall.
Previous research has demonstrated collaborative inhibition, but the moderating factors remain under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether memory task type (free recall vs. serial recall) and recall method (turn-taking vs. unconstrained) influence the collaborative inhibition effect.
To further test the validity of the retrieval strategies disruption hypothesis in explaining collaborative inhibition.
To determine if specific recall conditions can mitigate or eliminate collaborative inhibition.

Main Methods:

Two experiments were conducted comparing the performance of collaborative and nominal groups.
Experiment 1 utilized free recall and serial recall tasks with unconstrained recall.
Experiment 2 employed the same tasks but incorporated a turn-taking recall method for both collaborative and nominal groups.

Main Results:

Collaborative inhibition was observed in the free recall task, but its magnitude decreased in the serial recall task.
In Experiment 2, the turn-taking method reduced collaborative inhibition in free recall compared to unconstrained recall.
The collaborative inhibition effect was entirely eliminated in the serial recall task across both experiments.

Conclusions:

The findings provide further support for the retrieval strategies disruption hypothesis as a key mechanism underlying collaborative inhibition.
Serial recall tasks and turn-taking methods appear to mitigate the disruptive effects of differing retrieval strategies in group memory.
Understanding these moderating factors is crucial for optimizing collaborative memory performance.