Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
Published on: May 2, 2018
Experimental Analysis of Radiation Protection Offered by a Novel Exoskeleton-Based Radiation Protection System versus
Maria Katsarou1, Bruce Zwiebel2, Rajarshi Pal Chowdhury3
1Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas; Section of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Purpose:
To evaluate the radiation protection offered by an exoskeleton-based radiation protection system (Stemrad MD) and to compare it with that offered by conventional lead aprons.
Methods:
The experimental setup involved 2 anthropomorphic phantoms, an operator, a patient, and a C-arm as the x-ray radiation source. Thermoluminescent detectors were used to measure radiation doses to different radiosensitive body parts on the operator phantom both with the exoskeleton and a conventional lead apron at the left radial and right femoral positions. Detected radiation doses for the exoskeleton and lead apron for different body parts and positions were compared.
Results:
At the left radial position, the mean radiation dose (mGy) reduction by the exoskeleton compared with that by the lead apron was >90% for the left eye lens (0.22 ± 0.13 vs 5.18 ± 0.08; P < .0001), right eye lens (0.23 ± 0.13 vs 4.98 ± 0.10; P < .0001), left head (0.11 ± 0.16 vs 3.53 ± 0.07; P < .0001), right head (0.27 ± 0.09 vs 3.12 ± 0.10; P < .0001), and left brain (0.04 ± 0.08 vs 0.46 ± 0.07; P < .0001). At the right femoral position, radiation reduction was >90% for the left eye lens (0.14 ± 0.10 vs 4.16 ± 0.09; P < .0001), right eye lens (0.06 ± 0.08 vs 1.90 ± 0.11; P < .0001), left head (0.10 ± 0.08 vs 4.39 ± 0.08; P < .0001), left brain (0.03 ± 0.07 vs 1.44 ± 0.08; P < .0001), right brain (0.00 ± 0.14 vs 0.11 ± 0.13; P = .06), and thyroid (0.04 ± 0.07 vs 0.27 ± 0.09; P < .0001). Protection of the torso was equivalent to that offered by conventional lead aprons.
Conclusions:
The exoskeleton-based system provided superior radiation protection to the physician compared with that provided by conventional lead aprons. The effects are particularly impactful for the brain, eye lens, and head areas.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
Absorption of Radiation
Personal Protective Equipment
Radiation: Applications
The average...

