Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individualised progesterone receptor modulator prevention strategies for triple-negative breast cancer in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers.

NPJ breast cancer·2026
Same author

Deep learning models to predict mammographic density jointly on standard dose and low dose images.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same author

Delivering integrated diabetes and mental healthcare for people with type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE): a mixed methods evaluation.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Survival Outcomes With or Without Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> Pathogenic Variant Carriers.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Model uncertainty estimates for deep learning mammographic density prediction using ordinal and classification approaches.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2026
Same author

The Impact of Ancestry on Performance of Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Scores: High Discrimination Performance Is Maintained in African Ancestry Populations, but Population-Specific Thresholds May Improve Risk Prediction.

Diabetes care·2026
Same journal

Literature Reviews After AI.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

Illustration of transfer learning from breast cancer detection to risk prediction: adaptation to local data and local objectives.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

RadGazeGen: radiomics and gaze-guided chest X-ray generation using diffusion models.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

DDARes-U<sup>2</sup>Net: a dual-decoder adversarial residual U<sup>2</sup>Net algorithm for segmentation of COVID-19 pneumonia lesions.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

High-speed optical tracking and augmented reality platform for image-guided interventions.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

Transplant-ready? Evaluating AI lung segmentation models in candidates with severe lung disease.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.0K

Automatic assessment of mammographic density using a deep transfer learning method.

Steven Squires1, Elaine Harkness1, Dafydd Gareth Evans2

  • 1University of Manchester, School of Health Sciences, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|April 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed a deep learning model for mammographic breast density assessment, achieving accuracy comparable to human experts. The automated system offers consistent predictions, aiding in cancer risk evaluation.

Keywords:
breast densitycancer riskdeep learningmammographytransfer learning

More Related Videos

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

22.6K
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.0K
Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

22.6K
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Mammographic breast density is a significant risk factor for breast cancer.
  • Radiologist assessments of density using visual analogue scales offer improved risk prediction.
  • Accurate and consistent breast density assessment is crucial for cancer risk stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop automated deep learning models for mammographic breast density estimation.
  • To train models using expert radiologist scores for accurate and consistent predictions.
  • To improve breast cancer risk prediction through advanced computational methods.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a large dataset of nearly 160,000 mammograms with dual expert density scoring.
  • Adapted two pre-trained deep neural networks to generate feature vectors.
  • Employed linear and nonlinear regression for density prediction, comparing against a simulated optimal method.

Main Results:

  • The deep learning model achieved a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 8.79 ± 0.21.
  • Model predictions demonstrated consistency and performance levels similar to human expert assessments.
  • Simulated optimal method yielded RMSEs between 7.98 and 8.90 for specific image views.

Conclusions:

  • A deep learning framework utilizing transfer learning was successfully demonstrated for density estimation.
  • The approach requires moderate computational resources and can be trained with limited data.
  • This automated method holds potential for enhancing breast cancer risk assessment accuracy and efficiency.