Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Specific recommendations to improve the design and conduct of clinical trials
Mark J Kupersmith1,2,3, Nathalie Jette4,5
1Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Mark.kupersmith@mountsinai.org.
Abstract:
There are many reasons why the majority of clinical trials fail or have limited applicability to patient care. These include restrictive entry criteria, short duration studies, unrecognized adverse drug effects, and reporting of therapy assignment preferential to actual use. Frequently, experimental animal models are used sparingly and do not accurately simulate human disease. We suggest two approaches to improve the conduct, increase the success, and applicability of clinical trials. Studies can apply dosing of the investigational therapeutics and outcomes, determined from animal models that more closely simulate human disease. More extensive identification of known and potential risk factors and confounding issues, gleaned from recently organized "big data," should be utilized to create models for trials. The risk factors in each model are then accounted for and managed during each study.
Insights
Clinical trials often fail due to poor animal models and limited data analysis. Improving these aspects, using better animal models and big data for risk management, can enhance trial success and patient care applicability.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Research
- Clinical Trial Design
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Clinical trials frequently fail or show limited patient applicability due to restrictive criteria, short durations, and inadequate animal models.
- Current experimental animal models often fail to accurately simulate human disease, limiting their utility in predicting therapeutic outcomes.
- Reporting biases, such as preferential reporting of assigned therapy over actual use, further complicate trial interpretation.
Discussion:
- Suggests utilizing animal models that more accurately simulate human disease for determining investigational therapeutic dosing and outcomes.
- Proposes leveraging "big data" to identify and understand risk factors and confounding variables for improved clinical trial modeling.
- Advocates for accounting for and actively managing identified risk factors within trial models to enhance reliability.
Key Insights:
- Enhanced animal models are crucial for accurate preclinical testing and therapeutic development.
- Big data analytics can uncover complex risk factors, enabling more robust clinical trial designs.
- Proactive management of identified risks within trial protocols is essential for success.
Outlook:
- Future clinical trials could achieve higher success rates and greater patient applicability through refined preclinical modeling and data-driven risk management.
- This approach promises to bridge the gap between experimental findings and real-world clinical practice.
- Further research into sophisticated big data analytics and advanced animal disease models is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Blinding
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

