Refractory multiple myeloma: Count refractory drugs, not lines of treatment!

Christof Scheid1

  • 1Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50924, Germany.

Insights

Current immunotherapies for multiple myeloma require numerous prior treatments. This study suggests focusing on treatment refractoriness rather than the number of prior therapies to improve patient access to CAR T-cell trials.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Current immunotherapeutic agents, such as CAR T-cells, are approved for multiple myeloma patients who have undergone at least 3-4 prior lines of treatment.
  • An increasing number of patients are becoming refractory to standard therapies in earlier lines of treatment, limiting their access to potentially life-saving immunotherapies.
  • Existing clinical trial inclusion criteria may not adequately reflect the evolving treatment landscape and patient refractoriness patterns in multiple myeloma.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the inclusion criteria of ongoing T-cell engaging immunotherapy trials in multiple myeloma.
  • To propose a modification of trial criteria to better align with current clinical realities and patient needs.
  • To advocate for a shift in focus from the number of prior therapy lines to the degree of treatment refractoriness.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of the inclusion criteria for currently enrolling T-cell engaging trials in multiple myeloma.
  • Evaluation of the current emphasis on the number of prior lines of therapy in trial eligibility.
  • Consideration of refractoriness to a specific number of agents as a potential alternative or supplementary criterion.

Main Results:

  • Current T-cell engaging trials in multiple myeloma predominantly use the number of prior lines of therapy as a key eligibility criterion.
  • This approach may exclude patients who have become refractory to multiple agents but have not yet received the requisite number of treatment lines.
  • The study highlights a potential mismatch between trial designs and the clinical management of refractory multiple myeloma.

Conclusions:

  • The current inclusion criteria for multiple myeloma immunotherapy trials should be re-evaluated.
  • Future protocols should consider emphasizing refractoriness to 3 or more agents over a strict line-of-therapy count.
  • Adjusting these criteria could broaden patient access to innovative immunotherapies, particularly CAR T-cell therapies, for those with earlier treatment failure.