Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Editing02:23

RNA Editing

9.1K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.1K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

33.7K
Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
33.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

mist: a hierarchical Bayesian framework for detecting differential DNA methylation dynamics in single-cell data.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Digital wearable insole-based identification of knee arthropathies and gait signatures using machine learning.

eLife·2024
Same author

magpie: A power evaluation method for differential RNA methylation analysis in N6-methyladenosine sequencing.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

NeuCA web server: a neural network-based cell annotation tool with web-app and GUI.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2022
Same author

The immune response after noise damage in the cochlea is characterized by a heterogeneous mix of adaptive and innate immune cells.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Discovery of an Oxepine-Containing Diketopiperazine Derivative Active against Concanavalin A-Induced Hepatitis.

Journal of natural products·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 3, 2025

A Method for Measuring RNA N6-methyladenosine Modifications in Cells and Tissues
08:56

A Method for Measuring RNA N6-methyladenosine Modifications in Cells and Tissues

Published on: December 5, 2016

11.0K

Evaluation of epitranscriptome-wide N6-methyladenosine differential analysis methods.

Daoyu Duan1, Wen Tang1, Runshu Wang2

  • 1Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 44106, Ohio, USA.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|April 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating RNA methylation analysis methods is crucial. TRESS and exomePeak2 offer the best balance of precision and efficiency for detecting differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in MeRIP-seq data.

Keywords:
Differentially Methylated RegionsEpigenomicsMeRIP-seqN6-methyladenosineRNA Methylation

More Related Videos

Exploring m6A and m5C Epitranscriptomes upon Viral Infection: an Example with HIV
14:40

Exploring m6A and m5C Epitranscriptomes upon Viral Infection: an Example with HIV

Published on: March 5, 2022

3.3K
Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Assay to Study m5C Modification in Arabidopsis
08:50

Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Assay to Study m5C Modification in Arabidopsis

Published on: May 14, 2020

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 3, 2025

A Method for Measuring RNA N6-methyladenosine Modifications in Cells and Tissues
08:56

A Method for Measuring RNA N6-methyladenosine Modifications in Cells and Tissues

Published on: December 5, 2016

11.0K
Exploring m6A and m5C Epitranscriptomes upon Viral Infection: an Example with HIV
14:40

Exploring m6A and m5C Epitranscriptomes upon Viral Infection: an Example with HIV

Published on: March 5, 2022

3.3K
Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Assay to Study m5C Modification in Arabidopsis
08:50

Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Assay to Study m5C Modification in Arabidopsis

Published on: May 14, 2020

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • RNA methylation, particularly N6-methyladenosine (m6A), plays a key role in post-transcriptional gene regulation and human diseases.
  • MeRIP-seq is an emerging technology for transcriptome-wide m6A quantification, driving advancements in RNA epigenetics.
  • Identifying Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs) is essential for analyzing MeRIP-seq data to understand disease mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate and compare existing statistical methods for detecting DMRs from MeRIP-seq data.
  • To benchmark the performance of eight different DMR calling algorithms using simulated and real datasets.
  • To provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of various analytical approaches for RNA methylation studies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Gamma-Poisson model and logit linear framework for data simulation, considering varying sample sizes and DMR proportions.
  • Assessed eight established DMR calling methods based on metrics including detection precision, False Discovery Rate (FDR), type I error, and runtime.
  • Analyzed three real MeRIP-seq datasets to evaluate method performance on biological data.

Main Results:

  • Method sensitivity is generally low in regions with low input signals but improves significantly with increased sample size.
  • TRESS and exomePeak2 demonstrated superior performance in precision, FDR control, type I error, and runtime, despite limitations in sensitivity.
  • DRME and exomePeak achieved high sensitivity but were associated with inflated FDR and type I error rates.
  • Analyses of real datasets revealed differences in identified DMR length and unique regions among the evaluated methods.

Conclusions:

  • No single method excels in all performance metrics for DMR detection in MeRIP-seq data.
  • TRESS and exomePeak2 are recommended for their balanced performance, while DRME and exomePeak may be considered when high sensitivity is prioritized over strict error control.
  • The choice of DMR calling method depends on specific research goals and data characteristics, necessitating careful consideration of trade-offs.