Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Light Acquisition02:16

Light Acquisition

8.5K
In order to produce glucose, plants need to capture sufficient light energy. Many modern plants have evolved leaves specialized for light acquisition. Leaves can be only millimeters in width or tens of meters wide, depending on the environment. Due to competition for sunlight, evolution has driven the evolution of increasingly larger leaves and taller plants, to avoid shading by their neighbors with contaminant elaboration of root architecture and mechanisms to transport water and nutrients.
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep learning in plant phenotyping: the first ten years.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

The Global Wheat Full Semantic Organ Segmentation (GWFSS) dataset.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2025
Same author

GPFN: Prior-Data Fitted Networks for Genomic Prediction.

IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Dynamic-budget superpixel active learning for semantic segmentation.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2025
Same author

Counting Canola: Toward Generalizable Aerial Plant Detection Models.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same author

Global Wheat Head Detection Challenges: Winning Models and Application for Head Counting.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same journal

UAV-based temporal synergistic estimation of multiple alfalfa qualities integrating physics-informed network and 3D allometric operator.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Machine learning to predict genotypes and genotype-environment interaction associated with complex traits for genomic selection.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

FQGR-net: Morphology-based litchi flower quantification and gender recognition.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Thermal image segmentation in weedy fields via synthetic RGB-trained models and GAN-based cross-modality alignment.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Unlocking almond breeding for nutritional composition with hyperspectral imaging.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

From plots to commercial fields: scalable, transferable cotton morphology and productivity estimation using functional growth proxies from UAV and PlanetScope time series.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes
06:41

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes

Published on: March 28, 2025

950

Benchmarking Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Methods for Image-Based Plant Phenotyping.

Franklin C Ogidi1, Mark G Eramian1, Ian Stavness1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

Plant Phenomics (Washington, D.C.)
|April 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Self-supervised learning (SSL) shows promise for plant phenotyping but generally underperforms supervised methods for detection and counting tasks. Diverse, domain-relevant pretraining data is crucial for optimal SSL performance.

More Related Videos

RGB and Spectral Root Imaging for Plant Phenotyping and Physiological Research: Experimental Setup and Imaging Protocols
11:37

RGB and Spectral Root Imaging for Plant Phenotyping and Physiological Research: Experimental Setup and Imaging Protocols

Published on: August 8, 2017

16.3K
Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform
06:28

Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes
06:41

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes

Published on: March 28, 2025

950
RGB and Spectral Root Imaging for Plant Phenotyping and Physiological Research: Experimental Setup and Imaging Protocols
11:37

RGB and Spectral Root Imaging for Plant Phenotyping and Physiological Research: Experimental Setup and Imaging Protocols

Published on: August 8, 2017

16.3K
Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform
06:28

Author Spotlight: Unraveling Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses Using the PlantScreen Robotic Platform

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Computer Vision
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Self-supervised learning (SSL) offers a way to use unlabeled plant phenotyping data.
  • SSL applications in plant phenotyping, especially for detection and counting, are under-explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Benchmark SSL methods (MoCo v2, DenseCL) against supervised learning for plant phenotyping tasks.
  • Evaluate the impact of pretraining dataset domain and redundancy on SSL performance.
  • Analyze learned representations from different pretraining strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Compared momentum contrast (MoCo) v2 and dense contrastive learning (DenseCL) with supervised learning.
  • Transferred learned representations to wheat head detection, plant instance detection, wheat spikelet counting, and leaf counting.
  • Investigated effects of source dataset domain and redundancy on downstream task performance.

Main Results:

  • Supervised pretraining generally outperformed SSL methods.
  • MoCo v2 and DenseCL learned distinct representations compared to supervised methods.
  • Diverse, domain-similar pretraining datasets maximized downstream performance.
  • SSL methods appeared more sensitive to pretraining data redundancy than supervised methods.

Conclusions:

  • SSL methods require careful consideration of pretraining data for effective plant phenotyping.
  • Supervised learning remains a strong baseline for image-based plant phenotyping tasks.
  • This study provides guidance for developing improved SSL techniques in this domain.