Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 4, 2013
Radiology malpractice lawsuits: California jury verdicts
Abstract:
In 1983, 16 out of every 100 U.S. physicians were sued for medical malpractice. The authors reviewed the courtroom results of all 144 lawsuits involving California radiologist defendants reported in Jury Verdicts Weekly (JVW) between 1971 and 1985. Almost half (66 of 144) of the lawsuits involved allegations of "failure to diagnose" (misinterpretations and oversights). About one third (45 of 144) involved procedure complications (angiography, 22; myelography, 11; intravenous contrast administration, 5; other, 7). About three fourths (93 of 127) of the verdicts favored the radiologist defendants. The authors' finding support the American College of Radiology Malpractice Awareness Task Force recommendations.
Insights
Radiologists faced medical malpractice lawsuits, with "failure to diagnose" being common. However, verdicts favored radiologists in most cases, supporting risk management recommendations.
Area of Science:
- Medical Law
- Radiology
- Medical Malpractice Litigation
Background:
- Medical malpractice lawsuits against physicians, including radiologists, are a significant concern.
- In 1983, 16% of U.S. physicians faced malpractice suits.
- Allegations in radiology lawsuits often involve diagnostic errors or procedural complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze courtroom outcomes of medical malpractice lawsuits involving California radiologists.
- To identify common allegations and defense success rates in radiology litigation.
Main Methods:
- Review of 144 lawsuits involving California radiologists from Jury Verdicts Weekly (JVW) between 1971 and 1985.
- Categorization of lawsuits based on allegations: "failure to diagnose" and procedure complications.
- Analysis of verdict outcomes favoring radiologist defendants.
Main Results:
- "Failure to diagnose" accounted for nearly half (66/144) of the lawsuits.
- Procedure complications were cited in about one-third (45/144) of cases.
- Radiologist defendants prevailed in approximately three-fourths (93/127) of the verdicts.
Conclusions:
- The study findings support recommendations from the American College of Radiology Malpractice Awareness Task Force.
- Radiologists generally succeed in defending against malpractice claims, particularly when proper diagnostic and procedural standards are met.
- Understanding common allegations can inform risk management strategies in radiology practice.
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Torts II
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...

