Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2025

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
Published on: July 22, 2025
Outcome prediction model and prognostic biomarkers for COVID-19 patients in Vietnam
Hien Thi Thu Nguyen1,2, Vang Le-Quy2,3,4, Son Van Ho5,4
1Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Insights
Accurate COVID-19 prognosis is crucial. Machine learning models using biomarkers like IL-6, ferritin, and D-dimer can predict disease severity with high accuracy, aiding clinical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Informatics
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Accurate prognosis for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is vital for patient management.
- Predicting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity aids in timely intervention and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a predictive model for COVID-19 severity using clinical and biological indicators.
- To identify reliable biomarkers for prognostic assessment in COVID-19 patients.
Main Methods:
- Machine learning and statistical analyses were applied to clinical and biological data from 261 Vietnamese COVID-19 patients.
- A random forest model was utilized to predict disease progression to severe conditions.
- Biomarker sets were validated on independent patient cohorts.
Main Results:
- A random forest model achieved 97% accuracy in predicting COVID-19 severity, with IL-6, ferritin, and D-dimer as key indicators.
- The model maintained 92% accuracy even without IL-6, demonstrating applicability in resource-limited settings.
- Two distinct biomarker sets (D-dimer, IL-6, ferritin and CRP, D-dimer, IL-6) showed effectiveness in assessing severity and prognosis.
Conclusions:
- A simple and reliable model integrating clinical data and specific biomarker sets can effectively assess COVID-19 severity and predict patient outcomes.
- The findings offer a practical tool for prognosis in diverse healthcare settings.
Background:
Accurate prognosis is important either after acute infection or during long-term follow-up of patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. This study aims to predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity based on clinical and biological indicators, and to identify biomarkers for prognostic assessment.
Methods:
We included 261 Vietnamese COVID-19 patients, who were classified into moderate and severe groups. Disease severity prediction based on biomarkers and clinical parameters was performed by applying machine learning and statistical methods using the combination of clinical and biological data.
Results:
The random forest model could predict with 97% accuracy the likelihood of COVID-19 patients who subsequently worsened to the severe condition. The most important indicators were interleukin (IL)-6, ferritin and D-dimer. The model could still predict with 92% accuracy after removing IL-6 from the analysis to generalise the applicability of the model to hospitals with limited capacity for IL-6 testing. The five most effective indicators were C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, IL-6, ferritin and dyspnoea. Two different sets of biomarkers (D-dimer, IL-6 and ferritin, and CRP, D-dimer and IL-6) are applicable for the assessment of disease severity and prognosis. The two biomarker sets were further tested through machine learning algorithms and relatively validated on two Danish COVID-19 patient groups (n=32 and n=100). The results indicated that various biomarker sets combined with clinical data can be used for detection of the potential to develop the severe condition.
Conclusion:
This study provided a simple and reliable model using two different sets of biomarkers to assess disease severity and predict clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Vietnam.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Cancer Survival Analysis
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

