Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2025
Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
A survey on the current practice of indicating an elective cesarean after a previous myomectomy
Giovanni Delli Carpini1, Valeria Verdecchia1, Luca Giannella1
1Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatological and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitude of obstetricians/gynecologists toward indicating an elective cesarean delivery in pregnant patients with a previous myomectomy.
Materials And Methods:
Web-based multiple-choice questions survey evaluating the attitude to indicate a cesarean with a composite summated score (range 56-280) from a 56-item Likert scale: score 56-112: weak attitude, 113-168: moderate, 169-224: strong, and 225-280: very strong. The reliability of the score (internal consistency) was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The association between the score and participants' characteristics was determined with a bivariate analysis followed by linear regression analysis. The "global importance" of each risk factor was defined as the prevalence of the answers: "moderately important", "very important", and "extremely important" on the Likert scale. Factors with a "global importance" >75% were considered "crucial" in influencing the choice to indicate a cesarean.
Results:
One-hundred-twenty obstetricians/gynecologists responded (response rate 70.6%). The mean ± SD composite summated score was 137 ± 31; 30 (25.0%) participants presented a "weak attitude to cesarean", 68 (56.7%) a "moderate attitude", 22 (18.3%) a "strong attitude", and none a "very strong attitude". The Cronbach's alpha was 0.934 (high internal consistency). A self-reported number of myomectomies performed per year >50 was associated with a lower score (-25 points, 95% CI -50 to -1, p = 0.04). Eight criteria resulted "crucial" in indicating a cesarean: opening of the endometrial cavity, monopolar electrosurgery, time surgery-pregnancy <6 months, 2+ previous myomectomies, hematoma formation in the surgical wound, 3+ removed fibroids, and a FIGO4 or FIGO3 removed fibroid.
Conclusions:
Obstetricians/gynecologists are cautious to indicate a cesarean in pregnant patients with a previous myomectomy, except for cases at hypothetic high-risk for uterine rupture, mainly supported by weak evidence. Information to patients and among clinicians is crucial to avoid inappropriate cesarean indications.KEY MESSAGESObstetricians/gynecologists are cautious to indicate a cesarean in pregnant patients with a previous myomectomy.Information to patients and among clinicians is crucial to avoid inappropriate cesarean indications in pregnant patients with a previous myomectomy.
