Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Colloids03:22

Colloids

Children at play often make suspensions such as mixtures of mud and water, flour and water, or a suspension of solid pigments in water known as tempera paint. These suspensions are heterogeneous mixtures composed of relatively large particles that are visible to the naked eye or can be seen with a magnifying glass. They are cloudy, and the suspended particles settle out after mixing. On the other hand, a solution is a homogeneous mixture in which no settling occurs and in which the dissolved...
Solubility03:00

Solubility

Solution, Solubility, and Solubility Equilibrium
A solution is a homogeneous mixture composed of a solvent, the major component, and a solute, the minor component. The physical state of a solution—solid, liquid, or gas—is typically the same as that of the solvent. Solute concentrations are often described with qualitative terms such as dilute (of relatively low concentration) and concentrated (of relatively high concentration).
In a solution, the solute particles (molecules, atoms, and/or ions)...
Entropy and Solvation02:05

Entropy and Solvation

The process of surrounding a solute with solvent is called solvation. It involves evenly distributing the solute within the solvent. The rule of thumb for determining a solvent for a given compound is that like dissolves like. A good solvent has molecular characteristics similar to those of the compound to be dissolved. For example, polar solutions dissolve polar solutes, and apolar solvents dissolve apolar solutes. A polar solvent is a solvent that has a high dielectric constant (ϵ ≥ 15); an...
The Phase Rule01:20

The Phase Rule

The phase rule describes the relationship between the variance (degrees of freedom), the number of components, and the number of phases in a system at equilibrium.Variance is a concept that denotes the number of independent intensive properties (properties are those that do not depend on the amount of material in the system), such as temperature, pressure, and composition, that can be altered without impacting the number of phases in equilibrium.In a single-component system, such as pure water,...
Surface Active Agents01:27

Surface Active Agents

Surfactants, named for their behavior at interfaces, positively adsorb at the interfaces of two phases, reducing interfacial tension. Their versatility as emulsifiers, detergents, and foaming agents stems from this ability. Surfactants, often termed amphiphiles, share the property of amphipathy, with molecules having both hydrophilic and hydrophobic portions. The hydrophilic part is called the head, and the hydrophobic part, including an elongated alkyl substituent, forms the tail.Surfactants...
Micelles01:30

Micelles

Micelle formation is an intricate process that hinges on the properties of amphiphilic or amphipathic molecules and the conditions of the system in which they are found. Amphiphilic molecules, which have both hydrophilic (water-attracting) and hydrophobic (water-repelling) parts, play a critical role in this process.In aqueous environments, these molecules arrange themselves such that their hydrophilic heads are turned towards the water phase, while their hydrophobic tails are oriented away...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wertheim association theory for ion pairing in electrolytes: The effect of neutral clusters.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Predicting Critical Micelle Concentrations from Short Time Scale Simulations.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025
Same author

A dataset for aqueous surfactant phase behavior as a function of temperature and composition.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

The Role of Counterions in the Assembly of Charged Virus-Like Shells.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025
Same author

Modeling Contact Angles with Chemically Specific Dissipative Particle Dynamics.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Diffusive evaporation dynamics in polymer solutions is ubiquitous.

Soft matter·2025
Same journal

Predicting Nirmatrelvir Resistance in SARS-CoV-2 M<sup>pro</sup> Mutants with an Integrated Computational Framework.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

From Cation Solvation to Anion Coordination: Lewis-Acidic Boranes Enable Halide Salt Electrolytes.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

In Vitro-Prepared A30P Alpha-Synuclein Fibrils Adopt the Conserved and Disease-Relevant Greek Key Fold.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

Metastructure Analysis of Self-Assembled Nanocubes with Different Equatorial Methyl Groups Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

A Cocoordinated <sup>1</sup>H Internal Reference Quantifies Proton-Exchange Bias in Coordinated-Water Diffusion.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Electrolyte-Dependent Coordination Site Dynamics for Redox Mediator Design in Lithium-O<sub>2</sub> Batteries: Exchange vs Rearrangement.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Phase Diagram Characterization Using Magnetic Beads as Liquid Carriers
12:37

Phase Diagram Characterization Using Magnetic Beads as Liquid Carriers

Published on: September 4, 2015

12.4K

Can Machine Learning Predict the Phase Behavior of Surfactants?

Joseph C R Thacker1,2, David J Bray1, Patrick B Warren1

  • 1The Hartree Centre, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, WA4 4AD, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
|April 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning can predict missing surfactant data but struggles with new phase diagrams due to data bias. Improving predictions requires incorporating data from experimental protocols.

More Related Videos

Extraction and Characterization of Surfactants from Atmospheric Aerosols
09:34

Extraction and Characterization of Surfactants from Atmospheric Aerosols

Published on: April 21, 2017

16.9K
Microtensiometer for Confocal Microscopy Visualization of Dynamic Interfaces
08:05

Microtensiometer for Confocal Microscopy Visualization of Dynamic Interfaces

Published on: September 9, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Phase Diagram Characterization Using Magnetic Beads as Liquid Carriers
12:37

Phase Diagram Characterization Using Magnetic Beads as Liquid Carriers

Published on: September 4, 2015

12.4K
Extraction and Characterization of Surfactants from Atmospheric Aerosols
09:34

Extraction and Characterization of Surfactants from Atmospheric Aerosols

Published on: April 21, 2017

16.9K
Microtensiometer for Confocal Microscopy Visualization of Dynamic Interfaces
08:05

Microtensiometer for Confocal Microscopy Visualization of Dynamic Interfaces

Published on: September 9, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Physical Chemistry
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Surfactant phase behavior is crucial for various industrial applications.
  • Predicting phase diagrams is complex and often relies on extensive experimental data.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers potential for accelerating these predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of ML methods for predicting nonionic surfactant phase behavior.
  • To identify limitations and areas for improvement in ML-based phase diagram prediction.
  • To assess the impact of data sampling strategies on prediction accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a dataset of twenty-three nonionic surfactants.
  • Tested various state-of-the-art machine learning classifiers.
  • Investigated the performance of ML in data imputation versus *de novo* phase diagram prediction.
  • Explored strategies for enhancing *de novo* prediction accuracy.

Main Results:

  • ML classifiers effectively filled missing data points in existing datasets.
  • Significant challenges were observed in predicting entire *de novo* phase diagrams due to data bias and limited chemical space.
  • Prediction accuracy was largely independent of the specific ML algorithm chosen.
  • Incorporating data from experimental-analogy sampling improved *de novo* prediction outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • ML is adept at data imputation for surfactant systems.
  • Robust *de novo* phase diagram prediction requires addressing data bias and chemical space limitations.
  • Strategic data acquisition, inspired by experimental protocols, is key to advancing ML-driven surfactant phase behavior prediction.