Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K
Reaction Quotient02:35

Reaction Quotient

48.8K
The status of a reversible reaction is conveniently assessed by evaluating its reaction quotient (Q). For a reversible reaction described by m A + n B ⇌ x C + y D, the reaction quotient is derived directly from the stoichiometry of the balanced equation as
48.8K
Bias01:22

Bias

4.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.3K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolution of noisy learning in games.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The effect of the fitness gradient on fixation probability.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Reply to Sacco: Complete spaces as outcomes of evolutionary optimization.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Payoff equivalence and complete strategy spaces of direct reciprocity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric public goods games.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Promoters of cooperation in evolutionary games.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 3, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K

Quantitative assessment can stabilize indirect reciprocity under imperfect information.

Laura Schmid1, Farbod Ekbatani2, Christian Hilbe3

  • 1KAIST Graduate School of AI, 02455, Seoul, South Korea. laura.schmid@kaist.ac.kr.

Nature Communications
|April 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study shows that using nuanced reputation scores, instead of simple good/bad labels, helps cooperation evolve even with private, unreliable information. Four specific norms are robust for sustaining cooperation in real populations.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

779
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 3, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

779
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Game Theory
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Indirect reciprocity explains cooperation through reputation and social norms.
  • Existing 'leading eight' norms require public, reliable information for cooperation.
  • Individuals assess others' interactions to build reputation and gain benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cooperation with nuanced reputation scores under private, unreliable information.
  • To identify robust social norms that facilitate cooperation in realistic scenarios.
  • To analyze the error-correcting properties of quantitative reputation assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical modeling of social norm dynamics.
  • Agent-based simulations of interaction networks.
  • Comparative analysis of different reputation assessment strategies.

Main Results:

  • Quantitative reputation scores are error-correcting, promoting cooperation with private, unreliable information.
  • Cooperation evolves when individuals only interact with those exceeding a reputation threshold.
  • Four specific social norms demonstrate robustness under challenging information conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Nuanced reputation systems are more effective than binary ones for fostering cooperation.
  • The identified robust norms offer insights into sustaining cooperation in natural populations.
  • This research advances understanding of cooperation mechanisms in complex social environments.