External validation of unsupervised COVID-19 clinical phenotypes and their prognostic impact

Daniele Roberto Giacobbe1,2, Emilio Di Maria1,3, Alberto Stefano Tagliafico1,4

  • 1Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Annals of Medicine
|April 13, 2023
PubMed

Insights

The FEN-COVID-19 phenotyping system accurately predicts mortality in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Phenotype C showed significantly higher mortality compared to phenotypes A and B, validating its prognostic value.

Area of Science:

  • Internal Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 exhibit diverse clinical presentations.
  • Classifying COVID-19 patients into phenotypes aids in understanding disease severity.
  • The FEN-COVID-19 system categorizes patients based on clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the prognostic value of the FEN-COVID-19 phenotyping system in an external cohort.
  • To assess the reproducibility of phenotype development using cluster analysis.
  • To evaluate the association between FEN-COVID-19 phenotypes and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 992 hospitalized COVID-19 patients was analyzed.
  • Patients were classified into phenotypes A, B, and C using the FEN-COVID-19 method.
  • Mortality rates were compared across phenotypes using survival analysis.

Main Results:

  • 18% (A), 76% (B), and 6% (C) of patients were assigned to FEN-COVID-19 phenotypes.
  • Phenotype C was associated with significantly higher mortality than phenotypes A and B (HR 3.10 and 2.20, respectively).
  • Cluster analysis identified three phenotypes with a similar prognostic gradient.

Conclusions:

  • The prognostic value of FEN-COVID-19 phenotypes was confirmed in an external cohort.
  • The system effectively predicts mortality risk in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
  • While validated, the mortality difference between phenotypes A and B was less pronounced than in the original study.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs01:05

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs

A single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP is a single nucleotide variation at a specific genomic position in a large population. It is the most prevalent type of sequence variation found in the human genome. Point mutations that occur in more than 1% of the population qualify as SNPs. These are present once every 1000 nucleotides on an average in the human genome. Replacement of a purine with another purine (A/G) or a pyrimidine with another pyrimidine (C/T) is known as a transition. In contrast,...
15.4K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
406
Classification of Illness01:17

Classification of Illness

The meaning of illness is individualized to each person who experiences an alteration in health. In contrast, disease is a medical term indicating a pathological change in the structure and function of the body or mind. It is a condition that has specific symptoms and boundaries.
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
7.7K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
539