Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Monitoring variability in parameter estimates for lumped parameter models of the systemic circulation using
Nikolai L Bjørdalsbakke1, Jacob Sturdy2, Emma M L Ingeström3
1Department of Structural Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Richard Birkelandsvei 1a, Trondheim, Norway. nikolai.l.bjordalsbakke@ntnu.no.
Personalizing physics-based cardiovascular models using optimization methods allows for individual patient identification. This approach distinguishes unique physiological states from population data, aiding disease diagnosis and prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Computational Modeling
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Physics-based cardiovascular models are emerging for clinical disease diagnosis and prognosis.
- Model personalization requires accurate physical and physiological parameters.
- Individualized parameters offer insights into specific patient states and disease etiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply a fast model optimization scheme to personalize cardiovascular models.
- To investigate two model formulations (closed-loop and open-loop) of the left ventricle and systemic circulation.
- To assess the feasibility of distinguishing individual parameter estimates from population estimates.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a local optimization scheme for model personalization.
- Applied both closed-loop and open-loop cardiovascular models.
- Used intermittently collected hemodynamic data (brachial pressure, stroke volume, outflow tract velocity) from 25 participants across multiple measurement days.
- Paired pressure waveforms from either the finger artery or carotid artery.
Main Results:
- Estimated parameter values were similar between the two model formulations.
- Systemic arterial compliance estimates significantly differed based on the choice of pressure waveform (finger vs. carotid).
- Higher systemic arterial compliance estimates were observed using the finger artery pressure waveform.
Conclusions:
- Parameter estimate variability within a participant on a single day was lower than across multiple days or the population.
- The optimization method successfully distinguishes individual participants from the general population.
- Different measurement days for individual participants can be identified by their parameter values.
More Related Videos
11:04Quantification of Global Diastolic Function by Kinematic Modeling-based Analysis of Transmitral Flow via the Parametrized Diastolic Filling Formalism
Published on: September 1, 2014
09:32Continuous Venous-Arterial Doppler Ultrasound During a Preload Challenge
Published on: January 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation....
Typical Model Studies
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models