An update on safety evaluation of immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

Matteo Rosellini1,2, Elisa Tassinari1,2, Andrea Marchetti1,2

  • 1Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

New first-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) offer improved outcomes. This review compares safety profiles and quality of life impacts of immune-based combinations versus sunitinib in mRCC patients.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment has advanced with immune-based combinations.
  • First-line options now include nivolumab plus ipilimumab or cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab plus axitinib or lenvatinib.

Approach:

  • This review compares safety profiles of first-line immune-based combinations against sunitinib.
  • It analyzes data from pivotal trials: CheckMate 214, CheckMate 9ER, KEYNOTE-426, and CLEAR.
  • Patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a key focus.

Key Points:

  • Concurrent use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) requires careful management of overlapping adverse events (AEs).
  • Immune-related and TKI-induced AEs, like hypertransaminasemia, present management challenges.
  • Understanding specific toxicity patterns and HRQoL impact is crucial for treatment selection.

Conclusions:

  • Physicians must consider both safety and HRQoL when selecting first-line therapy for mRCC.
  • Safety profiles and HRQoL assessments can guide optimal treatment choices in mRCC.

Related Concept Videos