Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

12:24
Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
Published on: August 29, 2014
11.0K
RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The FISH-Based Translocation Assay
J-F Barquinero1, Y Abe2, N Aneva3
1Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Radiation Research
|April 14, 2023
Summary
This study assessed the accuracy of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for radiation dose assessment in an inter-laboratory comparison. While FISH effectively distinguished irradiated from non-irradiated samples, a tendency to overestimate radiation doses was observed.
Area of Science:
- Radiation biology
- Cytogenetics
- Biophysical dosimetry
Background:
- Translocation analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is crucial for assessing past ionizing radiation exposure.
- Inter-laboratory comparisons for FISH-based dose assessment are less common than for other methods like dicentric analysis.
- The European Network of Biological and Physical retrospective Dosimetry (RENEB) 2021 inter-laboratory comparison provided an opportunity to evaluate FISH performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an inter-laboratory comparison using the FISH technique for radiation dose assessment.
- To gain experience with FISH-based dose assessment in a simulated emergency scenario.
- To evaluate the consistency and accuracy of FISH translocation analysis across multiple laboratories.
Main Methods:
- Peripheral blood samples from a healthy volunteer were irradiated with known doses (0, 1.2, 3.5 Gy) and sent to seven participating laboratories.
- Laboratories applied their standard FISH techniques for translocation analysis.
- Results were reported based on triage analysis (fewer cells) and full analysis (500 cells), with dose estimations provided.
Main Results:
- Most laboratories successfully discriminated between unexposed and irradiated samples.
- Triage analysis showed heterogeneity in cell counts, while full analysis was more homogeneous.
- Excluding outlier results, mean dose estimations showed deviations from delivered doses, with a general tendency to overestimate.
Conclusions:
- FISH is a viable method for discriminating irradiated from non-irradiated samples in retrospective dosimetry.
- Harmonization efforts are needed to improve the accuracy and consistency of FISH-based dose assessment.
- Further inter-laboratory exercises are recommended to address the observed overestimation of radiation doses.

