Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

14:46
Efficient Generation of hiPSC Neural Lineage Specific Knockin Reporters Using the CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas9 Double Nickase System
Published on: May 28, 2015
11.1K
Imaging Method Using CRISPR/dCas9 and Engineered gRNA Scaffolds Can Perturb Replication Timing at the HSPA1 Locus
Xiong Xiong1, Ipek Tasan2, Che Yang2
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
ACS Synthetic Biology
|April 14, 2023
Summary
Live-cell chromosome tagging methods were compared. CRISPR-based imaging may affect DNA replication timing but not subnuclear positioning or gene expression, making it suitable for many genome architecture studies.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Visualizing specific chromosomal sites is crucial for understanding genome architecture.
- Programmable DNA-binding proteins like TAL effectors and CRISPR/dCas9, or TetO/TetR systems, are used for live-cell imaging of endogenous loci in mammalian cells.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of different live-cell chromosome tagging methods on subnuclear positioning, adjacent gene expression, and DNA replication timing.
- To evaluate the suitability of CRISPR-based imaging for genome architecture research.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of live-cell chromosome tagging techniques, including TetO/TetR and CRISPR/dCas9-based methods.
- Assessment of subnuclear localization, gene expression of adjacent loci, and DNA replication timing after locus labeling.
Main Results:
- CRISPR-based imaging was found to potentially delay DNA replication timing and sister chromatid resolution in specific regions.
- Neither TetO/TetR nor CRISPR-based methods significantly affected the subnuclear localization of the labeled locus.
- Gene expression from loci adjacent to the labeled sites remained unaffected by both tagging methods.
Conclusions:
- CRISPR-based imaging is a viable method for live-cell chromosome tagging in genome architecture research.
- The method's potential impact on DNA replication timing should be considered for specific applications.
- CRISPR-based imaging is suitable for studies not focused on DNA replication analysis.
Keywords:
CRISPR-SiriusDNA replicationHSPA1 geneTAL effectorTet operator/Tet repressorimagingsite-specific targetingMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Homologous Recombination
50.8K
The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
50.8K
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
82
The CRISPR-Cas system serves as a bacterial defense mechanism against invading genetic elements such as viruses and plasmids, forming the foundation for its adaptation as a powerful genome-editing tool. Originally discovered in prokaryotes, this system has been repurposed to revolutionize genetic engineering across a wide range of organisms, including plants, animals, and humans. The core component, Cas9, is an endonuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, capable of introducing...
82
CRISPR
52.5K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
52.5K

