Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust external-beam calibration of plastic scintillation detectors and uncertainty analysis for<i>in-vivo</i>dosimetry in HDR brachytherapy.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Polarized Cherenkov light imaging dosimetry: the impact of source to detector distance.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Microdosimetry calculations in situ for clinically relevant photon sources and their correlation with the early DNA damage response.

Medical physics·2025
Same author

Development and characterization of the Hydra: a novel multi-headed, single optical channel scintillation detector.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Assessing radiosensitivity through sublethal damage recovery: a comparison of survival-based and molecular repair kinetics.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Roadmap: medical physics technologies in brachytherapy.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Measured and Monte Carlo simulated electron backscatter to the monitor chamber for the varian TrueBeam linac (2016<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>61</b>8779).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: 3D range-modulator for scanned particle therapy: development, Monte Carlo simulations and experimental evaluation (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>7075).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Recent progress in applications of computing to radiotherapy (ICCR 2016).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Novel TMS coils designed using an inverse boundary element method.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.8K

FastDM,Mcalculation in LDR brachytherapy using deep learning methods.

Francisco Berumen1,2, Shirin A Enger3,4, Luc Beaulieu1,2

  • 1Service de Physique Médicale et de Radioprotection, Centre Intégré de Cancérologie, CHU de Québec- Université Laval et Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|April 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning models can now rapidly predict accurate dose distributions for low-dose rate brachytherapy, overcoming Monte Carlo simulation time limitations. This advancement enables faster and more precise prostate cancer treatment planning.

Keywords:
Monte CarloTOPASbrachytherapydeep learningdose calculation

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &#945; and &#946; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.3K
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.8K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &#945; and &#946; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.3K
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are accurate for brachytherapy dose calculation but are computationally intensive.
  • Clinical implementation of MC methods is limited by long computation times.
  • Accurate dose distribution is crucial for effective low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for predicting dose to medium (DM,M) distributions in LDR prostate brachytherapy.
  • To accelerate dose calculation by leveraging DL trained on MC simulations.
  • To integrate prior physics knowledge into the DL model for improved accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • A 3D U-Net convolutional neural network was trained using 2369 single-seed configurations from 44 prostate patient plans.
  • The model incorporated prior knowledge of brachytherapy dose dependency using an r2 kernel.
  • DL and MC dose distributions were compared using dose maps, isodose lines, and dose-volume histograms.

Main Results:

  • The DL model accurately predicted dose distributions, with small differences below the 20% isodose line compared to MC.
  • Predicted CTV D90 showed an average difference of -0.1% compared to MC.
  • The DL model predicted DM,M volumes in 1.8 ms, significantly faster than MC.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed DL model offers a fast and accurate method for dose calculation in LDR prostate brachytherapy.
  • The model effectively incorporates physical principles, including source anisotropy and tissue heterogeneity.
  • This DL approach has the potential to significantly improve clinical brachytherapy treatment planning.