Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025
Multicolor 3D Printing of Complex Intracranial Tumors in Neurosurgery
Published on: January 11, 2020
Developing Next-Generation 3-Dimensional Printing for Cervical Cancer Hybrid Brachytherapy: A Guided Interstitial
Mallika Marar1, Thomas Niedermayr1, Elizabeth A Kidd1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Purpose:
We developed a 3-dimensionally (3D) printed tandem anchored radially guiding interstitial template (TARGIT) to increase the simplicity of intracavitary/interstitial technique for tandem-and-ovoid (T&O) procedures in cervical cancer brachytherapy. This study compared dosimetry and procedure logistics between T&O implants using the original TARGIT versus the next-generation TARGIT-Flexible-eXtended (TARGIT-FX) 3D-printed template designed for practice-changing ease-of-use with further simplified needle insertion and increased flexibility in needle placement.
Methods And Materials:
This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing T&O brachytherapy as part of definitive cervical cancer treatment. Procedures used the original TARGIT from November 2019 through February 2022 and the TARGIT-FX from March 2022 through November 2022. The FX design features full extension to the vaginal introitus with 9 needle channels and allows for needle additions or depth adjustments intraprocedure and after computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Results:
A total of 148 implants were performed, 68 (46%) with TARGIT and 80 (54%) with TARGIT-FX, across 41 patients. Across implants, the TARGIT-FX achieved higher mean V100% (+2.8%, P = .0019), and across patients, the TARGIT-FX achieved higher D90 (+2.0 Gy, P = .037) and higher D98 (+2.7 Gy, P = .016) compared with the original TARGIT. Doses to organs at risk were overall similar between templates. Procedure times for TARGIT-FX implants were 30% shorter on average than for those using the original TARGIT (P < .0001), and 28% shorter on average for the subset of implants with high-risk clinical target volume ≥30 cc (P = .013). All residents (100%, N = 6) surveyed regarding the TARGIT-FX indicated ease-of-use for needle insertion and interest in applying the technique in future practice.
Conclusions:
The TARGIT-FX achieved shorter procedure times with increased tumor coverage and similar normal tissue sparing compared with the previously applied TARGIT and illustrates the potential of 3D printing to enhance efficiency and shorten the learning curve for intracavitary/interstitial procedure technique in cervical cancer brachytherapy.
