Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) through the lens of precision oncology: a single institution perspective

L Weiss1,2,3, K Heinrich1, D Zhang1,4

  • 1Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

Insights

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and molecular tumor board (MTB) reviews offer therapeutic recommendations for cancer of unknown primary (CUP) patients. However, low implementation rates highlight the need for earlier CGP integration in CUP management.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genomics
  • Precision Medicine

Background:

  • Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) presents limited treatment options.
  • Precision oncology, utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and targeted therapies, aims to improve outcomes for advanced cancers.
  • Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) are emerging as key decision-making platforms in complex oncology cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of a molecular tumor board (MTB) in guiding the therapeutic management of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) patients.
  • To assess the rate of therapeutic recommendations derived from CGP and MTB review in CUP.
  • To identify factors influencing the implementation of MTB-based treatment strategies for CUP.

Main Methods:

  • A single-center, retrospective observational study analyzed CUP patients presented to an MTB.
  • Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize patient data and MTB findings.
  • The study period spanned from June 2016 to February 2022, involving a tertiary care center.

Main Results:

  • Of 61 CUP patients reviewed, 74% had clinically relevant genomic variants detected via CGP.
  • Therapeutic recommendations were made for 64% of patients with detected variants.
  • Treatment recommendations were implemented in only 14% of cases, with limited clinical benefit observed.

Conclusions:

  • CGP and MTB review yield a high rate of therapeutic recommendations for CUP patients.
  • Low implementation rates of recommendations were observed, often due to physician preference or patient decline.
  • Early integration of CGP and MTB referral is crucial for improving treatment outcomes in CUP.