Related Experiment Video For invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)
Updated: Aug 2, 2025
Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors
Published on: February 27, 2015
Comprehensive proteome, phosphoproteome and kinome characterization of luminal A breast cancer
Ganglong Yang1,2, Chenyang Zuo2, Yuxiang Lin3,4,5
1The Key Laboratory of Carbohydrate Chemistry & Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Background:
Breast cancer is one of the most frequently occurring malignant cancers worldwide. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are the two most common histological subtypes of breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to deeply explore molecular characteristics and the relationship between IDC and ILC subtypes in luminal A subgroup of breast cancer using comprehensive proteomics and phosphoproteomics analysis.
Methods:
Cancer tissues and noncancerous adjacent tissues (NATs) with the luminal A subtype (ER- and PR-positive, HER2-negative) were obtained from paired IDC and ILC patients respectively. Label-free quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics methods were used to detect differential proteins and the phosphorylation status between 10 paired breast cancer and NATs. Then, the difference in protein expression and its phosphorylation between IDC and ILC subtypes were explored. Meanwhile, the activation of kinases and their substrates was also revealed by Kinase-Substrate Enrichment Analysis (KSEA).
Results:
In the luminal A breast cancer, a total of 5,044 high-confidence proteins and 3,808 phosphoproteins were identified from 10 paired tissues. The protein phosphorylation level in ILC tissues was higher than that in IDC tissues. Histone H1.10 was significantly increased in IDC but decreased in ILC, Conversely, complement C4-B and Crk-like protein were significantly decreased in IDC but increased in ILC. Moreover, the increased protein expression of Septin-2, Septin-9, Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 and Kinectin but reduce of their phosphorylation could clearly distinguish IDC from ILC. In addition, IDC was primarily related to energy metabolism and MAPK pathway, while ILC was more closely involved in the AMPK and p53/p21 pathways. Furthermore, the kinomes in IDC were primarily significantly activated in the CMGC groups.
Conclusions:
Our research provides insights into the molecular characterization of IDC and ILC and contributes to discovering novel targets for further drug development and targeted treatment.
