Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

10:33
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
15.8K
Disparities in Radiologist Fee-For-Service Payments by Gender in Canada.
Hayley McKee1, Cynthia Walsh2, Mana Modares1
1Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Summary
Canadian female radiologists earn 19% less than males in fee-for-service (FFS) payments. This gender pay gap persists despite women working fewer days, indicating systemic disparities in radiology compensation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Economics
- Radiology
- Health Equity
Background:
- Fee-for-service (FFS) models are common in healthcare reimbursement.
- Understanding gender-based disparities in physician compensation is crucial for equity.
- Radiology is a field where FFS payments significantly impact earnings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the gender pay gap in fee-for-service radiology payments in Canada.
- To identify potential factors contributing to observed payment differences between male and female radiologists.
- To analyze trends in the gender pay gap over a defined period.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of publicly available FFS radiology billing data from four Canadian provinces (2017-2021).
- Data stratified by gender, province, and year, including procedure billings and days worked.
- Calculation of the gender pay gap as the difference in mean billing payments relative to men's payments.
Main Results:
- A 19% gender pay gap was observed, with women earning 81% of men's FFS payments.
- The pay gap remained consistent between 2017 and 2021, with variations across provinces.
- Women radiologists worked 8% fewer days annually than men, which did not fully explain the payment disparity.
Conclusions:
- A significant gender pay gap exists for Canadian radiologists operating under FFS models.
- The disparity in FFS payments is not solely attributable to the number of days worked.
- Further research is needed to explore other contributing factors to this persistent inequity in radiology compensation.

