Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Knee Joint01:23

Knee Joint

2.0K
The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
2.0K
Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella01:16

Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella

2.7K
The femur is the body's longest and strongest bone spanning the thigh region. Its head articulates with the acetabulum of the hip bone to form the hip joint. A minor indentation on the medial side of the femoral head, called the fovea capitis, serves as the site of attachment for the ligament of the head of the femur. This weak ligament spans the femur and acetabulum and supports the hip joint. The narrowed region below the head is the neck of the femur. The inclination angle between the...
2.7K
Muscles that Move the Leg01:23

Muscles that Move the Leg

2.2K
The movement of the legs is facilitated by numerous muscles located within the anterior, medial, and posterior compartments of the thigh.
Anterior Compartment
The quadriceps femoris, the most visible muscle of the anterior compartment, is integral for leg extension and thigh flexion. It is formed by merging four distinct muscles — the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, vastus intermedius, and rectus femoris. The quadriceps tendon, a shared tendon of the four quadriceps muscles, is affixed...
2.2K
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

7.7K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
7.7K
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

12.5K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
12.5K
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

9.7K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
9.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tourniquet Use in Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Small Gains in Fixation, No Clear Benefit in Aseptic Loosening. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Is it time for a systematic and objective assessment of knee laxity? The impact of objective knee laxity after TKA on patient-reported outcomes: a comprehensive review.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2026
Same author

CT-based estimation of medial and lateral femoral joint lines in extension and flexion: A large three-dimensional validation study.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2026
Same author

5-Year Results of an Implantable Shock Absorber Demonstrate Durable Outcomes in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.

JB & JS open access·2026
Same author

Short-term benefits of image-based robotic assistance in TKA after prior HTO: A comparative study.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Line-to-line cementation in hip arthroplasty : what is the current role of the 'French Paradox'?

The bone & joint journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 2, 2025

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

8.0K

Knee kinematics during staircase descent.

Amelie Chevalier1,2,3, Hannes Vermue4, Lauren Pringels4

  • 1Department of Electromechanical, Metals and Systems Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Bone & Joint Research
|April 17, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study compared knee implant performance during stair descent. The bi-cruciate retaining implant demonstrated better approximation of natural knee motion than the bi-cruciate stabilized implant.

More Related Videos

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
08:26

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

6.1K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 2, 2025

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

8.0K
Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
08:26

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

6.1K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic biomechanics
  • Knee joint kinematics
  • Implant design evaluation

Background:

  • Tibiofemoral knee joint kinematics are crucial for natural movement.
  • Stair descent involves complex multi-axial knee motion.
  • Evaluating knee implant performance in simulated physiological conditions is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare tibiofemoral knee joint kinematics between bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized knee implants during simulated stair descent.
  • To determine which implant type better replicates native knee kinematics.
  • To assess implant laxity under various loading conditions.

Main Methods:

  • In vitro simulation of a full stair descent using a dynamic knee rig.
  • Testing on 20 knee joint specimens with physiological muscle forces.
  • Measurement of laxity envelopes under varus/valgus and internal/external rotational loads.

Main Results:

  • Both implants replicated native internal/external laxity during controlled lowering.
  • The bi-cruciate retaining implant showed better approximation of native kinematics for internal/external rotation and anteroposterior translation.
  • This improved kinematic replication extended to compression-distraction during swing and controlled lowering phases.

Conclusions:

  • The bi-cruciate retaining knee implant more closely mimics native knee kinematics compared to the bi-cruciate stabilized implant.
  • Further clinical investigation is needed to determine if this kinematic advantage translates to improved patient outcomes.
  • The study provides valuable biomechanical data for knee implant development.