Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025
Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model
Published on: August 17, 2022
Adjustable slings versus other surgical methods in female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and
Bagrat Grigoryan1, Gor Shadyan2,3, George Kasyan4,2
1Urology Department of Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Vuchetich 21 str. Moscow, Russian Federation, Moscow, 127206, Russian Federation. bagybaga97@gmail.com.
Introduction And Hypothesis:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different adjustable slings compared to other surgical methods for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) among women.
Methods:
The inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs assessing adult women with SUI. The exclusion criteria were as follows: other types of urinary incontinence, studies that combined conservative interventions and pharmacological treatment, pregnant and lactating patients. Databases were searched up to November 2022 to identify articles evaluating the effectiveness and safety of different adjustable slings compared to other surgical methods for the treatment of SUI among women. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 checklist and registered in PROSPERO. Risk-of-bias assessment tools recommended by the Cochrane Society were used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies.
Results:
Eighteen clinical trials were included in this systematic review, and 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Fourteen studies were RCTs, and four were retrospective studies. Only RCTs were included in the meta-analyses. There was no statistically significant difference in the objective cure rate, subjective cure rate, or long-term postoperative complication rate between Ajust single-incision mini-slings (SIMS) and standard mid-urethral slings (SMUS) or MiniArc SIMS. However, the operation time in the adjustable SIMS group was significantly shorter (RR = -4.20, 95% CI: [-7.51, -0.89], p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that adjustable SIMS is equally effective when compared with SMUS for the treatment of SUI among women. Moreover, the operation time for the adjustable SIMS was shorter. However, additional well-designed studies with standard outcome measures and complete follow-up periods will help to increase confidence in the choice of different options for treating SUI among women.
