Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Willingness intensity and co-evolution of decision rationality depending on aspiration enhance cooperation in the
Shounan Lu1, Ge Zhu2, Jianhua Dai3
1College of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
The Fermi rule states that rational or irrational sentiment affects individual decision-making. Existing studies have assumed that individuals' irrational sentiments and behavior willingness have fixed values and do not change with time. In reality, people's rationality sentiment and behavior willingness may be influenced by some factors. Therefore, we propose a spatial public goods game mechanism, in which individuals' rational sentiment is co-evolution synchronously depending on the difference between aspiration and payoff. Moreover, the intensity of their subjective willingness to change the status quo depends on the gap between aspiration and payoff. We likewise compare the combined promotion effect of the stochastic "Win-Stay-Lose-Shift" (WSLS) and random imitation (IM) rules. Simulation experiments indicate that high enhancement factors are not conducive to cooperation under the IM rules. When aspiration is small, WSLS is more conducive to promoting cooperation than IM, while increasing aspiration, and the opposite phenomenon will appear. The heterogeneous strategic update rule is beneficial to the evolution of cooperation. Lastly, we find that this mechanism performs better than the traditional case in enhancing cooperation.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Limits to Natural Selection
Solution Equilibrium and Saturation
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic