Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Arterial Pouch Microsurgical Bifurcation Aneurysm Model in the Rabbit
Published on: May 14, 2020
Urgent endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid occlusion is associated with a high mortality
Jamie A Schlacter1, Molly Ratner2, Jeffrey J Siracuse3
1NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Insights
Urgent carotid revascularization for symptomatic occlusions carries higher risks, particularly mortality, compared to severe stenosis. Careful patient selection is crucial for this rare, high-risk procedure.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Cardiology
Background:
- Outcomes of interventions for carotid occlusions are not well-defined.
- Urgent carotid revascularization for symptomatic occlusions is a rare but critical procedure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the outcomes of urgent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic carotid occlusions.
- To compare perioperative outcomes between patients with carotid occlusion and those with severe stenosis.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2020).
- Included symptomatic patients undergoing urgent CEA within 24 hours of presentation, identified via imaging.
- Compared outcomes with patients undergoing urgent intervention for severe stenosis (≥80%).
Main Results:
- 390 patients underwent urgent CEA for symptomatic occlusions; the cohort had significant cerebrovascular risk factors.
- Carotid occlusion patients experienced significantly higher perioperative mortality (2.8% vs 0.9%) and a worse composite outcome of stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI) (7.7% vs 4.9%) compared to severe stenosis.
- Multivariate analysis confirmed carotid occlusion as a significant risk factor for increased mortality and adverse composite outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Revascularization for symptomatic carotid occlusion is rare (approx. 2% of interventions) but associated with elevated perioperative adverse events, primarily mortality.
- While perioperative neurological events can be acceptable, the overall risk is higher than for severe stenosis.
- Judicious patient selection is essential for this high-risk group undergoing carotid intervention.
Objective:
Interventions for carotid occlusions undertaken are undertaken and the outcomes are poorly defined. We sought to study patients undergoing urgent carotid revascularization for symptomatic occlusions.
Methods:
The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried from 2003 to 2020 to identify patients with carotid occlusions undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Only symptomatic patients undergoing urgent interventions within 24 hours of presentation were included. Patients were identified based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. This cohort was compared with symptomatic patients undergoing urgent intervention for severe stenosis (≥80%). The primary end points were perioperative stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI) and composite outcomes as defined by the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting guidelines. Patient characteristics were analyzed to determine predictors of perioperative mortality and neurological events.
Results:
We identified 390 patients who underwent urgent CEA for symptomatic occlusions. The mean age was 67.4 ± 10.2 years (range, 39-90 years). The cohort was predominantly male (60%) with associated risk factors for cerebrovascular disease, including hypertension (87.4%), diabetes (34.4%), coronary artery disease (21.6%), and current smoking (38.7%). This population had high use of medications, including statins (78.6%), P2Y12 inhibitors (32.0%), aspirin (77.9%), and renin-angiotensin inhibitors (43.7%) preoperatively. When compared with patients undergoing urgent endarterectomy for severe stenosis (≥80%), those with symptomatic occlusion were well-matched with regard to risk factors, but the severe stenosis cohort seemed to be managed better medically and less likely to present with cortical stroke symptoms. Perioperative outcomes were significantly worse for the carotid occlusion cohort, primarily driven by higher perioperative mortality (2.8% vs 0.9%; P < .001). The composite end point of stroke/death/MI was also significantly worse in the occlusion cohort (7.7% vs 4.9%; P = .014). On multivariate analysis, carotid occlusion was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 3.028; 95% confidence interval, 1.362-6.730; P = .007) and composite outcome of stroke, death, or MI (odds ratio, 1.790; 95% confidence interval, 1.135-2.822; P = .012).
Conclusions:
Revascularization for symptomatic carotid occlusion constitutes approximately 2% of carotid interventions captured in the Vascular Quality Initiative, affirming the rarity of this undertaking. These patients have acceptable rates of perioperative neurological events, but are at an elevated risk of overall perioperative adverse events, primarily driven by higher mortality, compared with those with severe stenosis. Carotid occlusion seems to be the most significant risk factor for the composite end point of perioperative stroke, death, or MI. Although intervention for a symptomatic carotid occlusion may be performed with acceptable rate of perioperative complications, judicious patient selection is warranted in this high-risk cohort.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Arteries of the Head and Neck
The internal carotid arteries supply blood to the anterior portion of the cerebrum. They enter the...
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

