Diagnostic models predicting paediatric viral acute respiratory infections: a systematic review

Danielle A Rankin1,2, Lauren S Peetluk3, Stephen Deppen3,4

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA danielle.a.rankin@vanderbilt.edu.

BMJ Open
|April 21, 2023
PubMed

Insights

This systematic review found that diagnostic models for predicting viral acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in children often have a high risk of bias in their analytical methods. External validation is crucial for these predictive models to improve clinical diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Viral acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are a common cause of childhood illness.
  • Accurate diagnostic models are needed to aid clinicians in identifying the causes of ARIs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and evaluate diagnostic models for predicting viral ARIs in children.
  • To assess the quality and applicability of existing prediction models.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of studies published between January 1975 and February 2022 was conducted.
  • Studies were identified through searches of PubMed and Embase.
  • Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies and PROBAST.

Main Results:

  • 18 studies were included in the review, with viral-specific influenza being the most common outcome.
  • Internal validation was reported in 44% of studies, and discrimination measures in 56%.
  • None of the studies performed external validation, and all exhibited a high risk of bias in analytic aspects, though other aspects had minimal bias concerns.

Conclusions:

  • Diagnostic prediction models can assist clinicians in the etiological diagnosis of viral ARIs.
  • Rigorous internal validation and subsequent external validation are recommended for these models.
  • Future research should focus on developing and validating models with robust methodologies.
Abstract