Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

163
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
163
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

304
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
304
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

233
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
233
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

163
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
163
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

125
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
125
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

406
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
406

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reporting of Cohort and Routinely Collected Data in Randomised Controlled Trial Protocols (SPIRIT-ROUTINE): extension checklist with explanation and elaboration.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

A Bayesian Location-Scale Joint Model for Time-To-Event and Multivariate Longitudinal Data With Association Based on Within-Individual Variability.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Adverse events following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in norwegian adolescents.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Risk of Suicide in Patients With Traumatic Injuries.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Quality standards for paediatric bronchiectasis care in the UK, a national study.

ERJ open research·2025
Same author

Comparative effectiveness of take-home dosing schedules for opioid agonist treatment in British Columbia, Canada: a target trial emulation protocol using a population-based observational study.

BMJ open·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Causal inference in survival analysis using longitudinal observational data: Sequential trials and marginal

Ruth H Keogh1, Jon Michael Gran2, Shaun R Seaman3

  • 1Department of Medical Statistics and Centre for Statistical Methodology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Statistics in Medicine
|April 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The sequential trials approach offers greater efficiency than marginal structural models with inverse probability of treatment weights for estimating causal effects from longitudinal data, particularly for time-varying treatments.

Keywords:
cystic fibrosisinverse probability weightingmarginal structural modelregistriessequential trialssurvivaltarget trialstime-dependent confounding

More Related Videos

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K
Monitoring Neuronal Survival via Longitudinal Fluorescence Microscopy
07:02

Monitoring Neuronal Survival via Longitudinal Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: January 19, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K
Monitoring Neuronal Survival via Longitudinal Fluorescence Microscopy
07:02

Monitoring Neuronal Survival via Longitudinal Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: January 19, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Longitudinal observational data enables causal inference for time-varying treatments on time-to-event outcomes.
  • Time-dependent confounding is a major challenge in such analyses.
  • Marginal structural models (MSM) using inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) are commonly used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the sequential trials approach with MSM-IPTW for estimating causal effects.
  • To evaluate the efficiency and assumptions of both methods for time-varying treatments.
  • To estimate the effect of dornase alfa on survival using the UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry data.

Main Methods:

  • The sequential trials approach creates sequential "trials" from new time origins, censoring individuals who deviate from assigned treatment.
  • Inverse probability of censoring weights are used to account for censoring in the sequential trials approach.
  • Both methods are compared using a simulation study and applied to real-world cystic fibrosis data.

Main Results:

  • The sequential trials approach can estimate parameters of a specific marginal structural model.
  • This approach often yields greater efficiency than MSM-IPTW due to less extreme weights.
  • Efficiency can be reversed at later time points depending on modeling assumptions.

Conclusions:

  • The sequential trials approach provides an efficient alternative for causal inference with time-varying treatments.
  • Understanding the differing assumptions and data utilization of each method is crucial.
  • The study provides valuable insights for analyzing complex longitudinal data in healthcare settings.