Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Prognostic Significance of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection
Abdul-Quddus Mohammed1, Fuad A Abdu1, Yang Su1
1Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Background:
The prognostic impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has been scarcely addressed in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study investigated the prevalence and prognostic significance of CMD as measured by a novel pressure wire-free coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) on clinical outcomes.
Methods:
Patients diagnosed with HFpEF from 2019 to 2021 were enrolled retrospectively. caIMR was used to quantify microvascular function, and patients were categorised into 2 groups based on their caIMR. The primary end points were composite of all-cause death and heart failure rehospitalisation.
Results:
Of 137 HFpEF patients, CMD (defined as caIMR ≥ 25) was present in 88 patients (64.2%). Forty-five patients (32.8%) experienced composite events during a mean follow-up of 15 months. Compared with patients with caIMR < 25, those with caIMR ≥ 25 had a notably higher incidence of composite events (16.3% vs 42.0%; P = 0.002). On survival analysis, patients with caIMR ≥ 25 demonstrated a worse prognosis than those with caIMR < 25 for composite events (P = 0.006). Patients with caIMR ≥ 25 in multiple coronary arteries showed a trend to worse outcome than those with caIMR ≥ 25 in a single coronary artery (log-rank P = 0.056). In adjusted analysis, caIMR ≥ 25 was independently predictive of adverse outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-6.70; P = 0.010). caIMR displayed a significant predictive power for adverse event prediction (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.767, 95% CI 0.677-0.858; P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
CMD is highly prevalent and is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in HFpEF patients. Assessment of CMD may identify high-risk patients early for intensified treatment and risk-factor management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations

