Weak correlation between total psoas muscle area and sarcopenia index for children with brain tumor

Ziwen Wang1, Shuangmei Zeng1, Ling Liu1

  • 1Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Insights

The sarcopenia index (SI) is not a reliable measure of muscle mass in pediatric brain tumor patients. Further research is needed to validate SI as a biomarker for sarcopenia in this population.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Biomarker Discovery
  • Muscle Physiology

Background:

  • Sarcopenia, characterized by loss of muscle mass, is a concern in pediatric oncology.
  • The sarcopenia index (SI) is a potential, but unvalidated, biomarker for assessing muscle mass in children.
  • Accurate assessment of muscle mass is crucial for monitoring treatment effects and nutritional status in pediatric cancer patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of the sarcopenia index (SI) as a measure of skeletal muscle mass in pediatric patients diagnosed with brain tumors.
  • To determine if SI correlates with established measures of muscle mass in this specific patient cohort.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (ages 1-16) with brain tumors.
  • Collected serum creatinine (Cr) and cystatin C (CysC) levels within 28 days of abdominal MRI.
  • Assessed total psoas muscle area (tPMA) from MRI and calculated z-scores for SI, tPMA, Cr, and CysC relative to age- and sex-matched references.

Main Results:

  • The SI z-score showed no significant correlation with the tPMA z-score (r=0.004).
  • Both Cr and CysC z-scores positively correlated with tPMA z-scores (r=0.249 and 0.320, respectively).
  • tPMA z-scores correlated strongly with body mass index z-scores (r=0.582) and decreased with higher tumor WHO grades, unlike SI z-scores.

Conclusions:

  • The sarcopenia index (SI) demonstrates a very weak correlation with muscle mass in pediatric brain tumor patients.
  • The current findings suggest SI is not a viable biomarker for sarcopenia in this population.
  • Further investigation is required to establish the clinical utility and validity of SI in pediatric oncology.
Abstract