Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
Collaborative Two-Stage Exams Benefit Students in a Biology Laboratory Course
Clara L Meaders1, Yalila Vega2
1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Collaborative two-stage exams improved student performance and perceptions in biology courses. Group exams particularly benefited students historically excluded from science, reducing assessment inequities.
Area of Science:
- Biology Education
- Educational Assessment
- Collaborative Learning
Background:
- Summative assessments in higher education often lack opportunities for collaborative learning.
- Two-stage exams integrate individual and group work into a single assessment structure.
- Previous research suggests benefits of collaborative learning for student engagement and performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of collaborative two-stage exams on student performance and perceptions in an upper-level biology laboratory course.
- To compare the effectiveness of online versus in-person two-stage exams.
- To investigate the influence of demographic factors, including students historically excluded from science (PEERs), on exam outcomes and perceptions.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of collaborative two-stage exams across two terms: one online and one in-person.
- Quantitative comparison of individual versus group exam performance.
- Analysis of student perceptions through closed- and open-ended survey questions.
- Comparison of outcomes across different demographic groups (PEER status, gender).
Main Results:
- Students performing in groups consistently outperformed those taking exams individually.
- Two-stage exams positively impacted overall student performance, with notable benefits for PEERs.
- Students reported generally positive perceptions of both the two-stage exam format and the group work component.
- No significant differences in perceptions were found based on PEER status or gender, but differences emerged related to exam term and format.
Conclusions:
- Collaborative two-stage exams are an effective pedagogical tool for enhancing student learning and engagement in biology.
- This assessment strategy has the potential to mitigate existing inequities in higher education, particularly for underrepresented student groups.
- The findings support the integration of group work into summative assessments to foster inclusive learning environments and improve academic outcomes.
More Related Videos
10:39Using Mouse Mammary Tumor Cells to Teach Core Biology Concepts: A Simple Lab Module
Published on: June 18, 2015
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Two-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology
Symbiosis