Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Implementation of Newborn Screening for Conditions in the United States First Recommended during 2010-2018
Sikha Singh1, Jelili Ojodu1, Alex R Kemper2
1Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
Insights
Newborn screening panels expanded significantly between 2010-2022, adding seven conditions like spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). Implementation pace varied, with SMA showing the most rapid adoption across states.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Genetics and Genomics
- Pediatrics
Background:
- The Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) guides state newborn screening (NBS) programs in the US.
- Seven new conditions were added to the RUSP between 2010 and 2022, expanding the scope of early disease detection.
- These additions reflect advancements in diagnostic capabilities and the identification of treatable genetic and congenital disorders.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the timeline and pace of adoption for newly added conditions to the RUSP by state NBS programs.
- To assess the variation in implementation speed for different screening conditions.
- To provide insights into the progress of nationwide newborn screening expansion.
Main Methods:
- Data collected on the addition of seven specific conditions to the RUSP from 2010 to 2022.
- Analysis of the time required for universal adoption (all 50 states and territories) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and critical congenital heart disease (CCHD).
- Calculation of the average annual implementation rate for Pompe disease, MPS I, X-ALD, SMA, and MPS II based on the number of screening programs.
Main Results:
- Universal screening for SCID and CCHD was achieved in 8.6 and 6.8 years, respectively.
- As of December 2022, screening rates varied: 37 programs for Pompe, 34 for MPS I, 32 for X-ALD, and 48 for SMA.
- Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) exhibited the most rapid implementation pace (11.3 programs/year), followed by CCHD (7.8), SCID (6.2), MPS I (5.4), Pompe (4.9), and X-ALD (4.7).
Conclusions:
- State newborn screening programs have progressively incorporated new conditions recommended by the RUSP.
- The pace of adoption for new NBS targets varies significantly, influenced by factors such as disease prevalence, diagnostic technology, and treatment availability.
- Continued monitoring of NBS implementation is crucial for ensuring timely access to early detection and intervention for newborns.
Abstract:
The Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) is the list of conditions recommended by the US Secretary of Health and Human Services for inclusion in state newborn screening (NBS). During 2010-2022, seven conditions were added to the RUSP: severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) (2010), critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) (2011), glycogen storage disease, type II (Pompe) (2015), mucopolysaccharidosis, type I (MPS I) (2016), X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) (2016), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) (2018), and mucopolysaccharidosis, type II (MPS II) (2022). The adoption of SCID and CCHD newborn screening by programs in all 50 states and three territories (Washington, D.C.; Guam; and Puerto Rico) took 8.6 and 6.8 years, respectively. As of December 2022, 37 programs screen for Pompe, 34 for MPS I, 32 for X-ALD, and 48 for SMA. The pace of implementation based on the average additional number of NBS programs per year was most rapid for SMA (11.3), followed by CCHD (7.8), SCID (6.2), MPS I (5.4), Pompe (4.9), and X-ALD (4.7).
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...

