Implementation of Newborn Screening for Conditions in the United States First Recommended during 2010-2018

Sikha Singh1, Jelili Ojodu1, Alex R Kemper2

  • 1Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.

Insights

Newborn screening panels expanded significantly between 2010-2022, adding seven conditions like spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). Implementation pace varied, with SMA showing the most rapid adoption across states.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • The Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) guides state newborn screening (NBS) programs in the US.
  • Seven new conditions were added to the RUSP between 2010 and 2022, expanding the scope of early disease detection.
  • These additions reflect advancements in diagnostic capabilities and the identification of treatable genetic and congenital disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the timeline and pace of adoption for newly added conditions to the RUSP by state NBS programs.
  • To assess the variation in implementation speed for different screening conditions.
  • To provide insights into the progress of nationwide newborn screening expansion.

Main Methods:

  • Data collected on the addition of seven specific conditions to the RUSP from 2010 to 2022.
  • Analysis of the time required for universal adoption (all 50 states and territories) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and critical congenital heart disease (CCHD).
  • Calculation of the average annual implementation rate for Pompe disease, MPS I, X-ALD, SMA, and MPS II based on the number of screening programs.

Main Results:

  • Universal screening for SCID and CCHD was achieved in 8.6 and 6.8 years, respectively.
  • As of December 2022, screening rates varied: 37 programs for Pompe, 34 for MPS I, 32 for X-ALD, and 48 for SMA.
  • Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) exhibited the most rapid implementation pace (11.3 programs/year), followed by CCHD (7.8), SCID (6.2), MPS I (5.4), Pompe (4.9), and X-ALD (4.7).

Conclusions:

  • State newborn screening programs have progressively incorporated new conditions recommended by the RUSP.
  • The pace of adoption for new NBS targets varies significantly, influenced by factors such as disease prevalence, diagnostic technology, and treatment availability.
  • Continued monitoring of NBS implementation is crucial for ensuring timely access to early detection and intervention for newborns.