Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

A Rat Model of Pressure Overload Induced Moderate Remodeling and Systolic Dysfunction as Opposed to Overt Systolic Heart Failure
Published on: April 30, 2020
Reclassification of moderate aortic stenosis based on data-driven phenotyping of hemodynamic progression
Iksung Cho1, William D Kim2, Subin Kim1,3,4
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Insights
Moderate aortic stenosis (AS) management is unclear. This study identified two AS progression groups: slow and rapid, with higher initial mean pressure gradient predicting faster progression and aortic valve replacement.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Management and follow-up of moderate aortic stenosis (AS) lack consensus due to poorly understood progression patterns.
- Identifying distinct hemodynamic trajectories in AS is crucial for effective patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify hemodynamic progression patterns of moderate AS.
- To investigate associated risk factors and clinical outcomes.
- To establish predictive markers for AS progression.
Main Methods:
- Latent class trajectory modeling was used to classify patients based on serial systolic mean pressure gradient (MPG) measurements from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
- Analysis included 686 patients with moderate AS and at least three TTE studies between 2010 and 2021.
- Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality and aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Main Results:
- Two distinct AS trajectory groups were identified: slow progression (44.6%) and rapid progression (55.4%).
- The rapid progression group had a significantly higher initial MPG (28.2 mmHg vs. 22.9 mmHg, P < 0.001).
- The rapid progression group showed significantly higher AVR rates (HR 3.4), but no significant difference in mortality.
Conclusions:
- Two distinct patient groups with moderate AS, characterized by slow and rapid hemodynamic progression, were identified.
- A higher initial MPG (≥24 mmHg) is associated with more rapid AS progression and increased likelihood of AVR.
- MPG demonstrates predictive value for managing moderate AS, aiding in risk stratification and treatment decisions.
Abstract:
The management and follow-up of moderate aortic stenosis (AS) lacks consensus as the progression patterns are not well understood. This study aimed to identify the hemodynamic progression of AS, and associated risk factors and outcomes. We included patients with moderate AS with at least three transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) studies performed between 2010 and 2021. Latent class trajectory modeling was used to classify AS groups with distinctive hemodynamic trajectories, which were determined by serial systolic mean pressure gradient (MPG) measurements. Outcomes were defined as all-cause mortality and aortic valve replacement (AVR). A total of 686 patients with 3093 TTE studies were included in the analysis. Latent class model identified two distinct AS trajectory groups based on their MPG: a slow progression group (44.6%) and a rapid progression group (55.4%). Initial MPG was significantly higher in the rapid progression group (28.2 ± 5.6 mmHg vs. 22.9 ± 2.8 mmHg, P < 0.001). The prevalence of atrial fibrillation was higher in the slow progression group; there was no significant between-group difference in the prevalence of other comorbidities. The rapid progression group had a significantly higher AVR rate (HR 3.4 [2.4-4.8], P < 0.001); there was no between-group difference in mortality (HR 0.7 [0.5-1.0]; P = 0.079). Leveraging longitudinal echocardiographic data, we identified two distinct groups of patients with moderate AS: slow and rapid progression. A higher initial MPG (≥ 24 mmHg) was associated with more rapid progression of AS and higher rates of AVR, thus indicating the predictive value of MPG in management of the disease.
More Related Videos
06:51Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pulmonary Hypertension: Classification and Pathogenesis
There are various classifications for PH, each relating to different underlying causes and also...
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests