Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nuclear Power02:36

Nuclear Power

8.0K
Controlled nuclear fission reactions are used to generate electricity. Any nuclear reactor that produces power via the fission of uranium or plutonium by bombardment with neutrons has six components: nuclear fuel consisting of fissionable material, a nuclear moderator, a neutron source, control rods, reactor coolant, and a shield and containment system.
Nuclear Fuels
Nuclear fuel consists of a fissile isotope, such as uranium-235, which must be present in sufficient quantity to provide a...
8.0K
Nuclear Fission02:50

Nuclear Fission

9.8K
Many heavier elements with smaller binding energies per nucleon can decompose into more stable elements that have intermediate mass numbers and larger binding energies per nucleon—that is, mass numbers and binding energies per nucleon that are closer to the “peak” of the binding energy graph near 56. Sometimes neutrons are also produced. This decomposition of a large nucleus into smaller pieces is called fission. The breaking is rather random with the formation of a large...
9.8K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

1.0K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of...
1.0K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution01:14

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution

1.1K
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
1.1K
Energy and Power of a Wave00:58

Energy and Power of a Wave

3.7K
The total energy associated with a wavelength is the sum of the potential energy and the kinetic energy. The average rate of energy transfer associated with a wave is called its power, which is total energy divided by the time it takes to transfer the energy. For a sinusoidal wave, energy and power are proportional to the square of both the amplitude and the angular frequency.
Waves can also be concentrated or spread out, as characterized by the intensity of the wave. Intensity is directly...
3.7K
Nuclear Stability03:18

Nuclear Stability

19.1K
Protons and neutrons, collectively called nucleons, are packed together tightly in a nucleus. With a radius of about 10−15 meters, a nucleus is quite small compared to the radius of the entire atom, which is about 10−10 meters. Nuclei are extremely dense compared to bulk matter, averaging 1.8 × 1014 grams per cubic centimeter. If the earth’s density were equal to the average nuclear density, the earth’s radius would be only about 200 meters.
To hold positively charged protons together...
19.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Halide-site-substituting spacer creates quasi-two-dimensional perovskites for vapour-deposited light-emitting diodes.

Nature nanotechnology·2026
Same author

Fusion yield enhancement via secondary beam-target reactions in laser-cluster experiments.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Penalty or premium for foreign ownership in Thailand? Comparing public support for waste-to-energy plants operated by Thai, Japanese, and Chinese Companies.

PloS one·2025
Same author

International climate adaptation assistance: Assessing public support in Switzerland.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Wind turbines as new smokestacks: Preserving ruralness and restrictive land-use ordinances across U.S. counties.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Pursuing decarbonization along with national security: Assessing public support for the Thacker Pass lithium mine.

PloS one·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Preparation and Evaluation of Hybrid Composites of Chemical Fuel and Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes in the Study of Thermopower Waves
09:35

Preparation and Evaluation of Hybrid Composites of Chemical Fuel and Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes in the Study of Thermopower Waves

Published on: April 10, 2015

8.9K

Comparing public support for nuclear and wind energy in Washington State.

Azusa Uji1, Jaehyun Song2, Nives Dolšak3

  • 1Graduate School of Law, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Plos One
|April 26, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Public support for nuclear over wind energy hinges on perceived impacts on health, jobs, landscapes, and electricity stability, not proximity to facilities. Resident perceptions shape energy policy preferences.

More Related Videos

High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
08:55

High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Published on: October 9, 2020

5.6K
Coupling Carbon Capture from a Power Plant with Semi-automated Open Raceway Ponds for Microalgae Cultivation
08:17

Coupling Carbon Capture from a Power Plant with Semi-automated Open Raceway Ponds for Microalgae Cultivation

Published on: August 14, 2020

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Preparation and Evaluation of Hybrid Composites of Chemical Fuel and Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes in the Study of Thermopower Waves
09:35

Preparation and Evaluation of Hybrid Composites of Chemical Fuel and Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes in the Study of Thermopower Waves

Published on: April 10, 2015

8.9K
High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
08:55

High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Published on: October 9, 2020

5.6K
Coupling Carbon Capture from a Power Plant with Semi-automated Open Raceway Ponds for Microalgae Cultivation
08:17

Coupling Carbon Capture from a Power Plant with Semi-automated Open Raceway Ponds for Microalgae Cultivation

Published on: August 14, 2020

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Energy Policy
  • Public Opinion
  • Renewable Energy

Background:

  • Growing net zero commitments and energy security concerns drive debate on future energy sources.
  • Public energy policy preferences, particularly choices between clean energy types, are under-explored compared to elite discourse.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate public support for nuclear versus wind energy at the state level.
  • To determine if proximity to energy facilities influences these preferences.
  • To understand how perceived impacts on health, jobs, landscapes, and electricity supply stability shape support.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized original survey data from a representative sample of 844 Washington residents.
  • Employed multiple regression models with Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimation.
  • Analyzed the influence of perceived energy source impacts and physical proximity to facilities.

Main Results:

  • Physical proximity to existing energy facilities did not significantly influence support for nuclear over wind energy.
  • Support for nuclear over wind energy was positively correlated with perceived benefits to landscapes and supply stability.
  • Support was negatively correlated with perceived impacts on health and local jobs.

Conclusions:

  • Public support for nuclear versus wind energy is driven by perceived attributes of the energy sources, not geographical proximity.
  • The importance of these attributes is moderated by the physical proximity to existing energy facilities.
  • Findings offer insights into public perception shaping energy policy preferences for clean energy transitions.