Use of chronological and adjusted ages to compare motor development of healthy preterm and fullterm infants
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2026

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
Published on: November 3, 2016
Insights
Gestational age at birth significantly impacts infant motor development. Adjusting for this age in preterm infants aligns their motor assessments with full-term peers, supporting maturational theory.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Infant Motor Development
- Gestational Age
Background:
- Preterm infants often exhibit developmental delays compared to full-term infants.
- Assessing preterm infant motor skills using chronological age may misrepresent their developmental status.
- Understanding the role of gestational age is crucial for accurate developmental assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine how gestational age at birth influences motor development in infancy.
- To evaluate the practice of using adjusted age for motor assessments in preterm infants.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 21 healthy preterm and 23 full-term infants participated.
- The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales were administered at 12, 15, and 18 months corrected age.
- Motor quotients were calculated using both chronological and adjusted ages for preterm infants.
Main Results:
- Using chronological age, full-term infants showed significantly higher gross- and fine-motor quotients than preterm infants.
- When adjusted age was applied to preterm infants, motor quotients between preterm and full-term groups were not significantly different.
- This suggests gestational age is a primary factor in observed motor development differences.
Conclusions:
- Infant motor development is strongly influenced by gestational age at birth.
- Adjusted age assessment for preterm infants is supported, aligning their motor development with full-term peers.
- Findings support maturational theory and the clinical practice of age adjustment in preterm infant evaluations.
Abstract:
To investigate the influence of gestational age at birth on motor development in infancy and the practice of basing motor assessments of preterm infants on an adjusted age, 21 healthy preterm and 23 fullterm infants were administered the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales at 12, 15 and 18 months of age. When quotients were based on chronological age, both the mean gross-motor and fine-motor developmental quotients of the fullterm group were significantly higher than those of the preterm group, indicating that the fullterm group had higher levels of motor development. However, when the quotients of the preterm group were based on adjusted age, which accounted for gestational age at birth, the motor quotients of the two groups did not differ significantly. It seems that motor development of healthy preterm and fullterm infants differs primarily as a function of gestational age at birth, which supports maturational theory and the practice of making age adjustments when evaluating motor development of preterm infants.
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Development
Physical Growth During Infancy and Toddlerhood
Development of Head Control During Infancy
Hand Control During Infancy and Toddlerhood
Locomotion During Infancy and Toddlerhood
Motor Skills Development During Early Childhood

