Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
Published on: July 15, 2009
Low Utilization of Lead Extraction Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis and Implanted Cardiac Electronic
Christopher T Sciria1, Edward V Kogan2, Ari G Mandler2
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Group (CORG), New York, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Background:
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-associated infections are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. Guidelines have cited endocarditis as a Class I indication for transvenous lead removal/extraction (TLE) among patients with CIEDs.
Objectives:
The authors sought to study utilization of TLE among hospital admissions with infective endocarditis using a nationally representative database.
Methods:
Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), 25,303 admissions for patients with CIEDs and endocarditis between 2016 and 2019 were evaluated on the basis of International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision, Clinical-Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes.
Results:
Among admissions for patients with CIEDs and endocarditis, 11.5% were managed with TLE. The proportion undergoing TLE increased significantly from 2016 to 2019 (7.6% vs 14.9%; P trend < 0.001). Procedural complications were identified in 2.7%. Index mortality was significantly lower among patients managed with TLE (6.0% vs 9.5%; P < 0.001). Presence of Staphylococcus aureus infection, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and large hospital size were independently associated with TLE management. TLE management was less likely with older age, female sex, dementia, and kidney disease. After adjustment for comorbidities, TLE was independently associated with significantly lower odds of mortality (adjusted OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60 by multivariable logistic regression, and adjusted OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.40-0.66 by propensity score matching).
Conclusions:
Utilization of lead extraction among patients with CIEDs and endocarditis is low, even in the presence of low rates of procedural complications. Lead extraction management is associated with significantly lower mortality, and its use has trended upward between 2016 and 2019. Barriers to TLE for patients with CIEDs and endocarditis require investigation.
More Related Videos
08:40Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts
Published on: July 18, 2025
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management