Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
Published on: March 18, 2022
MRI Does Not Improve Inter- or Intrarater Reliability for Hip Arthritis Grading Systems
W Michael Pullen1, Kinsley Pierre2, Ivan Wong3
1Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Background:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and radiographs are often utilized in assessing for preoperative osteoarthritis in patients undergoing hip preservation surgery.
Purpose:
To determine if MRI scans improve inter- or intrarater reliabilities over radiographs for findings of hip arthritis.
Study Design:
Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Anteroposterior and cross-table lateral radiographs as well as a representative coronal and sagittal T2-weighted MRI scan were reviewed for 50 patients by 7 experienced subspecialty hip preservation surgeons, with a minimum experience of 10 years. Radiographs and MRI scans were assessed for joint space narrowing, subchondral cysts, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, Likert osteoarthritis grade (none, mild, moderate, or severe), and Tönnis grade. MRI scans were also evaluated for bony edema, heterogeneous articular cartilage, and chondral defects. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were calculated utilizing the Fleiss method with a 95% CI.
Results:
The scans of 50 patients (28 female and 22 male) with a mean age of 42.8 years (SD, 14.2 years; range, 19-70 years) were reviewed. Radiographs revealed fair agreement for joint space narrowing (κ = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.21-0.30]), osteophytes (κ = 0.26 [95% CI, 0.14-0.40]), Likert osteoarthritis grading (κ = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.28-0.37]) and Tönnis grade (κ = 0.30 [95% CI, 0.26-0.34). Radiographs revealed moderate agreement for subchondral cysts (κ = 0.53 [95% CI, 0.35-0.69]). MRI scans demonstrated poor to fair agreement for joint space narrowing (κ = 0.15 [95% CI, 0.09-0.21]), subchondral sclerosis (κ = 0.27 [0.19-0.34]), heterogeneous articular cartilage (κ = 0.07 [95% CI, 0.00-0.14]), Likert osteoarthritis grade (κ = 0.19 [95% CI, 0.15-0.24]), and Tönnis grade (κ = 0.20 [95% CI, 0.15-0.24]). MRI scans demonstrated substantial agreement for subchondral cysts (κ = 0.73 [95% CI, 0.63-0.83]). Intrarater reliabilities were statistically improved compared with interrater reliabilities, but no differences were found between radiographs and MRI scans for joint space narrowing, subchondral cysts, osteophytes, osteoarthritis grade, or Tönnis grade.
Conclusion:
Radiographs and MRI scans had substantial limitations and inconsistency between raters in evaluating common markers of hip osteoarthritis. MRI scans demonstrated strong reliability in evaluating for subchondral cysts but did not improve the interobserver variability of grading hip arthritis.
Insights
Radiographs and MRI scans show limitations in assessing hip osteoarthritis, with neither imaging modality consistently improving interrater reliability for grading hip arthritis. MRI scans excel at identifying subchondral cysts but do not enhance overall hip arthritis assessment reliability.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographs are commonly used to evaluate preoperative osteoarthritis in patients undergoing hip preservation surgery.
- Assessing hip arthritis preoperatively is crucial for surgical planning and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the inter- and intrarater reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans versus radiographs for diagnosing hip arthritis.
- To determine if MRI scans offer improved diagnostic accuracy over radiographs for specific osteoarthritis markers.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 50 patients (mean age 42.8 years) underwent review of anteroposterior and cross-table lateral radiographs alongside coronal and sagittal T2-weighted MRI scans.
- Seven experienced hip preservation surgeons evaluated the imaging for joint space narrowing, subchondral cysts, osteophytes, sclerosis, Likert grade, and Tönnis grade.
- Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were calculated using the Fleiss method with 95% confidence intervals.
Main Results:
- Radiographs showed fair agreement for joint space narrowing, osteophytes, Likert grade, and Tönnis grade, and moderate agreement for subchondral cysts.
- MRI scans demonstrated poor to fair agreement for most osteoarthritis markers but substantial agreement for subchondral cysts.
- While intrarater reliability improved, no significant differences in interrater reliability were found between radiographs and MRI for key osteoarthritis indicators.
Conclusions:
- Both radiographs and MRI scans exhibit significant limitations and interrater variability in assessing common hip osteoarthritis markers.
- MRI scans provide high reliability for detecting subchondral cysts but do not improve the overall interobserver variability in grading hip arthritis.
- Neither imaging modality consistently outperforms the other in reliably grading hip osteoarthritis, highlighting the need for improved assessment methods.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...

