Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

406
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
406
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.5K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

210
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
210
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

132
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
132
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.3K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beneficial effects of cranberry juice enriched with omega-3 fatty acids in patients with type 2 diabetic and periodontal disease: A randomized pilot clinical trial.

Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry·2025
Same author

DeepTensor: Low-Rank Tensor Decomposition With Deep Network Priors.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2024
Same author

Expanded Multiplexing on Sensor-Constrained Microfluidic Partitioning Systems.

Analytical chemistry·2023
Same author

Dose-dependent neuroprotective effects of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on amyloid β-induced Alzheimer's disease in rats.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2023
Same author

Preconditioning adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells with dimethyl fumarate promotes their therapeutic efficacy in the brain tissues of rats with Alzheimer's disease.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2023
Same author

The earthquake's effect on the men's sexual function; 1 year after the earthquake's occurrence: A cross-sectional study.

Health science reports·2022
Same journal

Hidden Data Recovery and Forecasting via Next-Generation Reservoir Computing With Multiscale Delay Selection.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

CAFF-CIL: Causality-Aware Freedom Forgetting Approach for Class-Incremental Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Harmonic Autoencoding Framework for Multiple Tasks in Magnetic Particle Imaging Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

A Survey on Human-Centric Voice-Face Multimodal Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Vision-Assisted Foundation Model for Solving Multitask Vehicle Routing Problems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

FP3O: Enabling Proximal Policy Optimization in Multiagent Cooperation With Parameter-Sharing Versatility.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Covariate Balancing Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not Adversarially Robust.

Hossein Babaei, Sina Alemohammad, Richard G Baraniuk

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |April 27, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Randomized trials require balanced groups for valid results. This study reveals that common covariate balancing methods can be vulnerable to worst-case assignments, potentially skewing treatment effect estimates.

    More Related Videos

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.1K
    Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
    04:57

    Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

    Published on: October 23, 2020

    10.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Aug 1, 2025

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
    06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    14.5K
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.1K
    Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
    04:57

    Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

    Published on: October 23, 2020

    10.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trials
    • Epidemiology

    Background:

    • Randomized trials are essential for evaluating treatment effectiveness by comparing outcomes between treatment and control groups.
    • Ensuring statistical similarity between groups is critical for trial validity and reliability.
    • Covariate balancing methods aim to improve group similarity but face challenges with limited sample sizes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To empirically demonstrate the susceptibility of covariate balancing methods to worst-case treatment assignments.
    • To introduce a method for identifying adversarial treatment assignments that maximize estimation errors.
    • To develop a metric for quantifying a trial's proximity to such worst-case scenarios.

    Main Methods:

    • Empirical analysis of covariate balancing using standardized mean difference (SMD) and Pocock and Simon's method.
    • Development of an adversarial attack to generate worst-case treatment assignments.
    • Introduction of an optimization-based algorithm, ATASTREET (adversarial treatment assignment in treatment effect trials), to find these assignments.

    Main Results:

    • Standardized mean difference (SMD) and Pocock and Simon's method are shown to be vulnerable to worst-case treatment assignments.
    • Adversarial attacks can identify treatment assignments leading to the highest possible average treatment effect (ATE) estimation errors.
    • The proposed index effectively measures a trial's closeness to a worst-case scenario.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing covariate balancing methods may not sufficiently protect against adversarial treatment assignments in randomized trials.
    • The ATA STREET algorithm provides a tool to identify and potentially mitigate risks associated with worst-case assignments.
    • Further research is needed to develop more robust covariate balancing strategies against adversarial attacks.