Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Author Spotlight: Process Development for the Spray-Drying of Probiotic Bacteria and Evaluation of the Product Quality
Published on: April 7, 2023
Perspective: Assuring the Quality of Protein in Infant Formula
1Nutrispectives, Spokane, WA, United States.
Insights
The protein efficiency ratio (PER) rat bioassay for infant formula protein quality is unreliable. A shift to the human milk essential amino acid pattern offers a simpler, internationally aligned standard for infant formula protein assessment.
Area of Science:
- Nutritional Biochemistry
- Food Science and Technology
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- Current infant formula regulations mandate the protein efficiency ratio (PER) rat bioassay for protein quality assessment.
- Authoritative bodies and international consensus question the PER's suitability for scoring infant formula protein quality.
- The PER's control protein, casein, does not align with the essential amino acid profile of human milk.
Approach:
- Review of current regulations and methodological recommendations for protein quality assessment in infant formula.
- Analysis of the limitations of the PER, particularly concerning its control protein (casein) and relevance to infant nutrition.
- Evaluation of the essential amino acid pattern of human milk as an international standard for infant formula protein quality.
Key Points:
- The PER bioassay may provide a false assurance of protein quality due to its reliance on casein as a control.
- The essential amino acid pattern of human milk is the internationally accepted standard for infant formula protein quality.
- Methodological adjustments to PER by the FDA focus on controlling nonprotein variables, not addressing the core issue of the control protein.
Conclusions:
- The FDA should revise protein quality assessment methods to align with the human milk essential amino acid pattern.
- Adopting the human milk standard would simplify the process, conform to international norms, and ensure accurate protein quality evaluation.
- Alternative methods for protein quality determination can be selectively employed for novel protein sources or manufacturing process evaluations.
Abstract:
Current regulations require that the assessment of protein quality in infant formula be determined using the protein efficiency ratio (PER) rat bioassay where the growth of rats fed a test protein is compared with the growth of rats fed casein. This review cites authoritative body opinions that the PER is not a preferred method for scoring protein quality, particularly as applied to the infant formula. Methodological recommendations specified by FDA and recent guidance propose to control nonprotein dietary variables in the PER. In contrast, the essential amino acid pattern of human milk has been adopted internationally as the standard for protein quality in infant formula. Because casein, the control protein in the PER fails to meet the standard of human milk essential amino acids, the PER based on casein can generate a false assurance of the quality of protein in an infant formula. FDA should revise the method of demonstrating the quality factor for the biological quality of protein to the essential amino acid pattern of human milk, which would be simpler, conform to international standards, and should be considered by FDA under a new statute. Alternate methods of determination of protein quality can be used selectively when there are questions about the digestibility of new protein sources or the effects of manufacturing processes.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
Quality Assurance

