Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction
Rose Sisk1,2, Matthew Sperrin1,3, Niels Peek1,3,4
1Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Handling missing data in clinical prediction models requires careful consideration of deployment scenarios. Regression imputation may be a practical alternative to multiple imputation, especially when data can be missing at deployment.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Missing data is a common challenge in clinical prediction model development, validation, and deployment.
- Multiple imputation is standard but difficult at deployment; regression imputation offers a pragmatic alternative.
- The utility of missing indicators for informative missingness in prediction models is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive performance of clinical prediction models using multiple imputation versus regression imputation.
- To evaluate strategies for handling missing data under different deployment scenarios (missing data permitted or prohibited).
- To assess the impact of including or omitting the outcome in imputation models and using missing indicators.
Main Methods:
- Simulated data under various missing data mechanisms.
- Compared predictive performance of models developed with multiple imputation and regression imputation.
- Evaluated scenarios with and without missing data at deployment, with/without outcome in imputation models, and with/without missing indicators.
- Applied methods to critical care data.
Main Results:
- When complete data is available at deployment, standard multiple imputation (using outcome) and regression imputation (omitting outcome) performed well.
- If missing data is allowed at deployment, omitting the outcome from the imputation model during development was preferred.
- Missing indicators generally improved performance but could be detrimental under outcome-dependent missingness.
Conclusions:
- Standard multiple imputation principles may not directly apply to clinical prediction models, especially with missing data at deployment.
- Multiple imputation and regression imputation showed comparable predictive performance.
- The optimal missing data strategy depends on the specific study and whether missing data is permitted at deployment.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Censoring Survival Data
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

