Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
'It's all about ticks': A secondary qualitative analysis of nurse perspectives about documentation audit
Gabriella Michl1, Catherine Paterson1,2,3, Kasia Bail1,2
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Aim:
To understand how nurses talk about documentation audit in relation to their professional role.
Background:
Nursing documentation in health services is often audited as an indicator of nursing care and patient outcomes. There are few studies exploring the nurses' perspectives on this common process.
Design:
Secondary qualitative thematic analysis.
Methods:
Qualitative focus groups (n = 94 nurses) were conducted in nine diverse clinical areas of an Australian metropolitan health service for a service evaluation focussed on comprehensive care planning in 2020. Secondary qualitative analysis of the large data set using reflexive thematic analysis focussed specifically on the nurse experience of audit, as there was the significant emphasis by participants and was outside the scope of the primary study.
Results:
Nurses': (1) value quality improvement but need to feel involved in the cycle of change, (2) highlight that 'failed audit' does not equal failed care, (3) describe the tension between audited documentation being just bureaucratic and building constructive nursing workflows, (4) value building rapport (with nurses, patients) but this often contrasted with requirements (organizational, legal and audit) and additionally, (5) describe that the focus on completion of documentation for audit creates unintended and undesirable consequences.
Conclusion:
Documentation audit, while well-intended and historically useful, has unintended negative consequences on patients, nurses and workflows.
Impact:
Accreditation systems rely on care being auditable, but when individual legal, organizational and professional standards are implemented via documentation forms and systems, the nursing burden is impacted at the point of care for patients, and risks both incomplete cares for patients and incomplete documentation.
No Patient Or Public Contribution:
Patients participated in the primary study on comprehensive care assessment by nurses but did not make any comments about documentation audit.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Introduction to Documentation and Reporting
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Formats for Nursing Documentation
Nursing Assessment Form:
• A nursing assessment form is a foundational document that captures detailed patient data from physical assessments and nursing histories.
• It includes patient demographics, medical history,...

