The Representativeness of Outdoor Particulate Matter Concentrations for Estimating Personal Dose and Health Risk...

This study investigated the suitability of outdoor particulate matter data obtained from a fixed monitoring station in estimating the personal deposited dose. Outdoor data were retrieved from a station located within the urban area of Lisbon and simulations were performed involving school children. Two scenarios were applied: one where only outdoor data were used assuming an outdoor exposure scenario, and a second one where an actual exposure scenario was adopted using the actual microenvironment during typical school days. Personal PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 dose (actual exposure scenario) was 23.4% and 20.2% higher than the ambient (outdoor exposure scenario) PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 doses, respectively. The incorporation of the hygroscopic growth in the calculations increased the ambient dose of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 by 8.8% and 21.7%, respectively. Regression analysis between the ambient and personal dose showed no linearity with R² at 0.07 for PM₁₀ and 0.22 for PM_2.5. On the other hand, linear regression between the ambient and school indoor dose showed no linearity (R² = 0.01) for PM₁₀ but moderate (R² = 0.48) for PM_2.5. These results demonstrate that ambient data must be used with caution for the representativeness of a realistic personal dose of PM_2.5 while for PM₁₀ the ambient data cannot be used as a surrogate of a realistic personal dose of school children.