Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Prediction of thrombosis in polycythemia vera: Development and validation of a multiple factor-based prognostic
Wenjing Gu1,2, Yuhui Zhang3, Ting Sun1,2
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Gene Therapy for Blood Diseases, CAMS Key Laboratory of Gene Therapy for Blood Diseases, Tianjin, China.
Background:
Thrombosis is an important cause of death in patients with polycythemia vera (PV). The conventional stratification of thrombosis may ignore some potential risk factors.
Objectives:
This study aimed to develop and validate a multiple factor-based prediction model of thrombosis for the 2016 World Health Organization-dened PV.
Methods:
Clinical and next-generation sequencing data from 2 cohorts of patients with PV were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted for the identification of thrombotic risk factors and model development.
Results:
The study involved 372 patients in the training cohort and another 195 patients in the external validation cohort. Multivariable analyses indicated that age ≥60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56, 95% CI 1.51-4.35, P < .001), cardiovascular risk factors (HR 4.22, 95% CI 2.00-8.92, P < .001), at least 1 high-risk mutation for thrombosis (mutations in DNMT3A, ASXL1, or BCOR/BCORL1) (HR 4.35, 95% CI 2.62-7.21, P < .001), and previous thrombosis (HR 5.93, 95% CI 3.29-10.68, P < .001) were independent risk factors of thrombosis. After assigning coefficient-weighted scores to each risk factor mentioned above, a multiple factor-based prognostic score system of thrombosis (MFPS-PV) was developed, classifying patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups. Patients in the 3 groups had notably different thrombosis-free survival rates (P < .001). The MFPS-PV outperformed the conventional model in discrimination power (C-statistic: 0.87 [95% CI 0.83-0.91] vs 0.80 [95% CI 0.74-0.86]). The MFPS-PV was well calibrated and remained consistent during external validation.
Conclusion:
The MFPS-PV, integrating genetic and clinical characteristics for the first time, shows excellent accuracy and utility for thrombosis prediction in WHO-defined PV.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Factors Affecting Erythropoiesis
Several factors influence the erythrocyte production rate, with tissue oxygen level being among the most critical. Intense exercise or high altitudes can cause tissue hypoxia, which triggers the kidneys to release more erythropoietin (EPO) into the bloodstream.
EPO then...
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.

