Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Multiphasic mixed growth models for turkeys
Sasha A S van der Klein1, Owen W Willems1, Martin J Zuidhof2
1Hendrix Genetics, Kitchener, ON, CanadaN2K 3S2.
Turkey growth models reveal significant differences between sexes and lines, with diphasic Gompertz models providing a better fit for growth trajectories. These findings aid in optimizing turkey breeding and nutrition strategies.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Quantitative Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- Accurate growth modeling is crucial for optimizing turkey feed formulation and breeding programs.
- Understanding sex and line variations in growth parameters is essential for genetic selection and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare parameter estimates of mono- and diphasic Gompertz growth models between sexes and lines in turkeys.
- To evaluate mono- and diphasic mixed Gompertz models for assessing parameter variations in female line turkey toms.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 1,056 manually recorded weekly body weight (BW) observations from male and female turkeys (male and female lines) from weeks 1 to 20 for objective 1.
- Employed daily median values of automatically collected individual BW of female line turkey toms for objective 2, incorporating random components into the Gompertz model.
- Analyzed growth curve shapes, inflection points, mature body weight (BW), and normalized growth rate constants across different line and sex combinations.
Main Results:
- Growth curve shapes significantly differed between male line toms, male line hens, female line toms, and female line hens (P < 0.001).
- Diphasic Gompertz models demonstrated a superior fit compared to monophasic models across all line × sex combinations (P < 0.001), with mixed diphasic models showing further improvement.
- Identified correlations where individuals with higher mature BW exhibited later inflection points and lower growth rate coefficients.
Conclusions:
- Diphasic Gompertz models offer a more accurate representation of turkey growth compared to monophasic models.
- Parameter variations in growth models provide insights for enhancing turkey breeding programs.
- The study provides a framework for evaluating dietary or environmental impacts on turkey growth trajectories.
More Related Videos
09:09Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
13:43Two-step Approach to Explore Early- and Late-stages of Organ Formation in the Avian Model: The Thymus and Parathyroid Glands Organogenesis Paradigm
Published on: June 17, 2018