Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Konsta Teppo1, K E Juhani Airaksinen1, Fausto Biancari2
1Heart Center Turku University Hospital and University of Turku Turku Finland.
Insights
Aortic stenosis (AS) increases bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may offer better stroke prevention than warfarin in AF patients with AS.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) are underrepresented in trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation (AF).
- Understanding AS impact on AF outcomes and DOAC efficacy is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of AS on outcomes in AF patients.
- To compare the effectiveness of DOACs versus warfarin in AF patients with AS.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Finnish Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation (FinACAF) registry data (2007-2018).
- Included 183,946 incident AF patients; 5,231 had AS.
- Employed cause-specific hazards regression and propensity score matching for analysis.
Main Results:
- AS was linked to higher risks of any bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and death.
- No significant association found between AS and intracranial bleeding or ischemic stroke after matching.
- In AS patients, DOACs showed lower ischemic stroke risk versus warfarin; no difference in bleeding or mortality.
Conclusions:
- AS significantly elevates gastrointestinal bleeding risk in AF patients.
- DOACs may provide superior ischemic stroke prevention compared to warfarin in AF patients with AS.
Abstract:
Background Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) have been underrepresented in the trials evaluating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess whether AS impacts outcomes in patients with AF and estimate the effects of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with AF and AS. Methods and Results The registry-based FinACAF (Finnish Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation) study covered all patients with AF diagnosed during 2007 to 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HRs) of first-ever gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, any bleeding, ischemic stroke, and death were estimated with cause-specific hazards regression adjusted for anticoagulant exposure variables. We identified 183 946 patients (50.5% women; mean age, 71.7 [SD, 13.5] years) with incident AF without prior bleeding or ischemic stroke, of whom 5231 (2.8%) had AS. The crude incidence rate of all outcomes was higher in patients with AS than in patients without AS. After propensity score matching, AS was associated with the hazard of any bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and death but not with intracranial bleeding or ischemic stroke (adjusted HRs, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.25-1.48], 1.63 [95% CI, 1.43-1.86], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.26-1.38], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.78-1.17], and 1.11 [95% CI, 0.99-1.25], respectively). Among patients with AS, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke when compared with warfarin, while bleeding and mortality did not differ between DOACs and warfarin. Conclusions AS is associated with substantially higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with AF. DOACs may be more effective in preventing ischemic stroke than warfarin in patients with AF and AS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04645537.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

