Is AI the way forward for reducing metal artifacts in CT? Development of a generic deep learning-based method and
Mark Selles1, Derk J Slotman2, Jochen A C van Osch3
1Department of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Purpose:
To develop a deep learning-based metal artifact reduction technique (dl-MAR) and quantitatively compare metal artifacts on dl-MAR-corrected CT-images, orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR)-corrected CT-images and uncorrected CT-images after sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion.
Methods:
dl-MAR was trained on CT-images with simulated metal artifacts. Pre-surgery CT-images and uncorrected, O-MAR-corrected and dl-MAR-corrected post-surgery CT-images of twenty-five patients undergoing SI joint fusion were retrospectively obtained. Image registration was applied to align pre-surgery with post-surgery CT-images within each patient, allowing placement of regions of interest (ROIs) on the same anatomical locations. Six ROIs were placed on the metal implant and the contralateral side in bone lateral of the SI joint, the gluteus medius muscle and the iliacus muscle. Metal artifacts were quantified as the difference in Hounsfield units (HU) between pre- and post-surgery CT-values within the ROIs on the uncorrected, O-MAR-corrected and dl-MAR-corrected images. Noise was quantified as standard deviation in HU within the ROIs. Metal artifacts and noise in the post-surgery CT-images were compared using linear multilevel regression models.
Results:
Metal artifacts were significantly reduced by O-MAR and dl-MAR in bone (p < 0.001), contralateral bone (O-MAR: p = 0.009; dl-MAR: p < 0.001), gluteus medius (p < 0.001), contralateral gluteus medius (p < 0.001), iliacus (p < 0.001) and contralateral iliacus (O-MAR: p = 0.024; dl-MAR: p < 0.001) compared to uncorrected images. Images corrected with dl-MAR resulted in stronger artifact reduction than images corrected with O-MAR in contralateral bone (p < 0.001), gluteus medius (p = 0.006), contralateral gluteus medius (p < 0.001), iliacus (p = 0.017), and contralateral iliacus (p < 0.001). Noise was reduced by O-MAR in bone (p = 0.009) and gluteus medius (p < 0.001) while noise was reduced by dl-MAR in all ROIs (p < 0.001) in comparison to uncorrected images.
Conclusion:
dl-MAR showed superior metal artifact reduction compared to O-MAR in CT-images with SI joint fusion implants.
